Published in the ring magazine, info: World Titles: Flyweight, Bantamweight Quality of competition: 8 Bouts vs. Top 50 fighters: 1 Why He`s Here: Robbed of the featherweight Title, he should have been a three division champion What He Could Have Done To Better His Ranking: Fought Johnny Femechon for the first time anywhere but Sidney. How good was Harada and how would he do against today`s world champs?
Seriously, do you only have one magazine? No magazines in the last 22 years have compiled any all-time lists? Isn't there a list like that in basically every boxing magazine every couple months?
What`s wrong with an old list I get plenty of reply`s on most of the posts and I stopped collecting the ring years ago, the 90`s was my era, better characters and stuff, I think this list is still relevant, there has`nt been that many great fighters in the last 22 years at all.
A 22-year old list compiling the best fighters of the past 50 years is in no way relevant because another 22 years have passed since the list came out. And you start a new thread about that 22-year-old list EVERY DAY. Find a new list that isn't 22 years old. They print them all time. ALL THE TIME. http://static.boxrec.com/2/25/TR201705.jpeg Every magazine published in the last 22 years has A MORE RELEVANT list. Every website created in the last 22 years HAS A MORE RELEVANT list. Every article in that issue is MORE RELEVANT than that list you keep starting new threads about every day. Don't buy a coffee today and BUY A NEW MAGAZINE. (Christ)
I didn`t say no great fighters I was just saying there weren`t so many that it would make this list to dated and redundant, these guys were awesome,they don`t just grow on trees, some decades in boxing are better than others, there isn`t a conveyor belt of elite fighters constantly churned out every decade, this is a fantastic list of fighters, maybe altered 10% maybe more, maybe less, what`s your problem?
I will continue with my still relevant list and paste your boxec.com site along with each title I post, happy?
On your “totally relevant” list, where are these guys rated? Floyd Mayweather? Manny Pacquiao? Oscar De La Hoya? Shane Mosley? Joe Calzaghe? Vitali Klitschko? Wladimir Klitschko? Lennox Lewis? Bernard Hopkins? Erik Morales? Prince Naseem Hamed? Marco Antonio Barrera? Juan Manuel Marquez? Winky Wright? Andre Ward? Carl Froch? Gennady Golovkin? Canelo Alvarez? Kostya Tszyu? Ricky Hatton? Arturo Gatti? Fernando Vargas? Jose Luis Castillo? Diego Corrales? Vasyl Lomachenko? Miguel Cotto? Mark “Too Sharp” Johnson? Antonio Tarver? Tomasz Adamek? Or do you not know who they are because you haven't purchased a magazine in 22 years?
Great achievement by harada who will always be relevant in aust for his fights with rose n famechon. Also I'll add what a great achievement from rose to beat a all time great at 18 YO in harada's home country. Harada v Inoue mythical match would be special.