Fighting Harada vs Jeff Fenech

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by WhataRock, Sep 1, 2008.


  1. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,848
    17,990
    Jul 29, 2004
    Ill will do a better analysis later when I get a chance but just quickly Ill say this.

    At bantam I reckon Harada takes this clearly, I mean a Harada in his prime in the mid 60's. Such a gun fighter, hands down one of the best at this weight all time.

    At super bantam, thats a really great fight because I think this is Jeff's best weight and h2h alltime there are few I would pick over him. But this is still a weight Harada would be very effective at.

    At feather, by now I think we are in Fenech ownage territory. To strong and intense at this weight.
     
  2. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    I go for Harada, on points. I think he was a better all round boxer than Fenech and close up would have suited him as well where he was very quick and accurate and he also didn't give his opponents a lot of room. He did struggle on the scales so superbantam might of suited him. At feather I couldn't say as we only saw Harada there at the end of his career. Fenech on the other hand was more in his prime at that weight.
     
  3. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,542
    Jul 28, 2004
    Harada on points, over 15 rounds, hard fought, but decisive.
     
  4. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,749
    11,295
    Aug 22, 2004
    ...........I can envision the odd clash of heads now and again.