Ive always been interested in thinking outside of the box, and one of those thoughts have been how would certain fighters fare against fighters that people wouldnt have thought about. Basically matchups that arent the norm, where the outcome can be easily debated without a real answer. 1) The first rule is to give advantages to both fighters. For example if one fighter is really low in weight then it would be fair to use the best example of that weight limit and any fighter who is at least three weight divisions higher that is chosen cannot be a top 20. The number 3 Welter in the world against someone outside the top 20 in the Light-Heavyweight divison. 2) Second rule is that each fighter must be known to the majority of the hardcore boxing fans and you must also provide video footage. So we can see footage of both combatants. 3) Also whilst its fantasy, and most likely would not happen, i would like a serious discussion on it...as it could make people think differently about fighters in general. It something that can break the rules that we have inprinted on boxing after all.....the number goal is to find who is the better fighter. 4) You must alos pick certain dates. 5) Also for peoples predications, then please provide a brief analysis of what would happen during the fight...and outcome. Il start -For example the fight takes place August 2010- Number 1 or 2 Welterweight Floyd Mayweather 5'8 147 (Fight night 155) against 90th to 100th heavyweight 6'4 (230lbs) Muarice Harris. Mayweather carrer is well documented...beaten Castillo, Judah, De La Hoya, Marquez and Mosley. Hasnt officially lost yet. M. Harris has had an up and down carrer lost to V. Bean, Old L. Holmes, D. Jefferson, C. Byrd, , F. Oquend and beaten D. Izon, J. Williams, S. Lykovich and J. Long. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cE1VwqA9RI[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmswbDd4CeM&feature=related[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE2w4nJlk0Q[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK9en6g9JTQ[/ame]
