what if Mendoza saw this fight but simply cant recall your two questions because he saw it long ago? Maybe he watched many old fights that same time and simply cant recall all the many details? I am not taking his side mcvey, just trying to cover all the possibilities, I don't mean to give him a easy out. Mendoza, can you chime in? Do you recall the two details that mcvey is asking you about or do you not recall them????
I take your point but they are so obvious if he had seen the fight he would know them.he has already stated,and made a particular point that Hague was ko'd in a corner ,he wasn't.
I see,,,, Mendoza, you need to answer mcvey's two questions without instead supplying a long post about stuff that you claim mcvey has got wrong,,, was that a defensive tactic basically saying that mcvey has got lots of stuff wrong and thus your mistake on this subject should not be overly singled out? If that's the case why not just say that instead? if you want to address the stuff you claim mcvey has got wrong make a thread about it. Now Mendoza, I want you to FULLY and CLEARLY answer mcveys TWO QUESTIONs and I want the answers by sundown. Its no big deal if you messed up Mendoza, just come clean and I will support you and provide you safe passage into the witness protection program.
The difference between you and I is I dont need to lie in order to "win" an argument. Go ahead and offer what you think is my fight list to whoever wants it. The people who actually have it will recognize immediately that it isnt mine. Im assuming this is the fight you are referring to, although its Henry Armstrong, not Ray Armstrong, whoever that is. [url]http://i1184.photobucket.com/albums/z335/klompton/vlcsnap-2016-07-13-12h43m03s693_zpscrzfwe3p.png[/url] [url]http://i1184.photobucket.com/albums/z335/klompton/vlcsnap-2016-07-13-12h44m51s387_zpshehbegym.png[/url] [url]http://i1184.photobucket.com/albums/z335/klompton/vlcsnap-2016-07-13-12h44m17s831_zpsif8u3zvt.png[/url] If youve got my list you should be able to tell me who that opponent is and what DVD number its on in my catalogue. No? Didnt think so. TTFN. Any more "rare" gems you want to tell me about? LOL.
I would welcome a thread about what I have got wrong, it would be a long one! Not surprising as I'm just a fan, not a boxing historian. What it won't contain are any deliberate lies by myself to win arguments or to big myself up. :yep:good
For latineg: McVey knows jack about fight films. I have said before footage exists in two round only. Many fight films do not show the introductions and some edit out information. Nothing was shown in the introduction to the film I saw. See how he tries to twist facts? It proves nothing. The dolt has no clue as to what I have seen. I sometimes say what happens in a fight film before its show in a public forum. He often doubts it. He one thought Johnson was not in trouble prior to the KO vs. Willard. BS, Willard nearly KO'd him the round before with a body shot. He kept his ignorance guard high, until the film was shown. I doubt he's seen round 25, but if he has, he'll have to retract what he said before. Notice a pattern here? If he's honest, he'll change his mind on the photo he's searching for. Hauge was out in a corner, not the middle of the ring. PS: The guy claims an IQ of 137 or 139. Yeah sure!
atch Any more misinformation? You can not or will not answer basic questions. Like I said before you guard your collection like a fictional dragon guards his treasure.
I'm not searching for any photos I have a photo of the Langford v Hague Not Hauge! knockout propped up against my screen as I type this. Here's another question. Is Hague lying unconscious on his left side , his right side,his front , or his back?
"If youve got my list you should be able to tell me who that opponent is and what DVD number its on in my catalogue. No? Didnt think so. TTFN" Why don't you answer him? This is a golden opportunity for you!
Mendoza please DO make a thread about all I've got wrong here, and I'll reciprocate with one listing all your inaccuracies and deliberate lies. DEAL?
Why not search for the photo? Have you seen it already ? Maybe I'll find the photo if it's out there and posts it here. I do recall he was out on his back in near a corner. That's pretty descriptive. I said that before here. You just don't remember it. In fact, you don't remember lots of things I or others say. You have your way of filtering out inconvenient truths. Or maybe you just forget and come back with the same amount stuff only to be proved wrong again! Perhaps it's a combination of both! My memory is fine. It's your personal jihad to prove me wrong for once. When I reach your age, I'll have better things to do.
You already said it. The liar here is you. I know it, you know it, and most important you know that I know it. This is why you feel a need to create a thread about an unknown to many, which boxing history is full of, and act like you're exposing something. You haven't proven a thing Tony. Keep up the good work.
I've just posted ,[the one you are replying to,] that I already have the photo.atsch It's my personal wish to expose you for what you are at every opportunity and I succeed, time and time again! Please post a thread detailing all my mistakes, as I said I'll reciprocate with yours . What Do You Say?
You need to change your trousers,someone has just sh*t in them :rofl Thanks for the entertainment!:good It was like watching Bogart as CaptainQueeg in the "Caine Mutiny ",sweating and wriggling on the witness stand.
Old ground, he'll just deny anything I say, despite the fact his name is on the list, phrases he uses here to describe fights here are on the list, and it's a massive collection full of fighters he likes to talk about here. He once hedged a bit saying you may have my " public list ". If he sends me his public list, I will be a gentleman and say if it's a match by sending him what I have in return. So PM me now K-man. Here's McVey chance to see me wrong! Don't let him down now! Deal?:deal I predict he won't do it! Klompton also didn't answer my question if he bid on something. Klompton has a way of stonewalling points he doesn't want to touch, often because he doesn't want to admit or talk about them.