Film Of The Langford v Hague Fight Question?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jul 11, 2016.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    This is Mendoza's statement.

    "Several posters here, including Ted Spoon, said they have seen this film".
    Ted Spoon has said to me he was mistaken ,he has a very good reputation on this forum ,and I have no problem readily believing whatever he says.
    It would be interesting to know the names of the other posters that, Mendoza says, claim to have seen this fight.
    I predict he will not produce them ,and I further predict he will say he was told by them in confidence,as though us knowing their names could compromise them in any way! :patsch

    Watch this space!
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    Waiting for a response Mendoza!

    No answer on what happened just before the fight between Hague and Langford began.
    And conformation fromTed Spoon that he HAS NOT seen the fight.Which other posters told you they had?

    I've provided proof the actual Ruhlin v Fitzsimmons fight was NOT filmed ,you owe me money.

    I'll settle for an admission that you are wrong.
    WAITING!

    BTW Make that list of all my mistakes and post it as I requested,and Ill do the same with yours DEAL?

    ITS PUT UP OR F*CK OFF TIME!!!
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Look Moron,

    Unlike yourself, I know what I saw. And even if you saw it its' been proven here you don't know what you are watching!

    There is no way for you to prove anything here. None.

    You really must be a special type of stupid. I told you not all fight films have introductions, and some are edited. But you don't know much about this. DUH! Do I really have to name some films that are missing rounds for your special education needs?

    Like I said, you often ask for extra information, hoping it's not out there on the web. I often produce it. My track record is pretty good.

    I have made errors here before. Not quite as frequently as you, but when they happen I say so. You accomplish nothing but wasting my time.

    PS: Yes it Fitzsimmons vs Ruhlin was filmed. That was the bet. You have been shamed before. Maybe I'll bump that thread to shame you further.
     
  4. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,225
    Mar 22, 2015
    Well I'm just a fascinated limited observer on here with no bias either way, but I believe Mr Mendoza has been exposed here!
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    I have proved the Ruhlin V Fitzsimmons fight was NOT filmed.In my earlier post.I have proved Ted Spoon has not seen the Hague v Langford fight .
    Now I ask you to provide the names of the other posters who claim to have seen the Hague v Langford fight and I know you won't,just as I knew you would not produce a verified offer of $30,000 for a Langford vJohnson fight.
    Just as I knew you would not know the answers to my questions regarding the Langford v Hague fight.
    Just as we knew you would not show Klompton's list when challenged to do so.


    Please do bump the thread and while you're at it make one of all my mistakes that you keep referring to ,and I'll reply with a thread about yours.
    How's that?

    You're just a congenital liar whom it amuses me to expose.


    The Ball Is In Your Court ,Don't Keep Running Away From It!
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    You are correct in your belief!
     
  7. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    977
    Nov 7, 2011
    Let's be open minded here. I do not watch reality television but I would watch with you two on a fornight car trip.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    Mendoza does not deal in reality.
    This link is about the man who made the re-enactment of the NewYork fight between Fitzsimmons and Ruhlin ,it was made in Philadelphia with the principals playing themselves ,Ruhlin needed stage make up to disguise the injuries to his face. Ruhlin's chief second in their actual fight was Jim Corbett he does not appear in the film because he travelled back to his home in San Francisco and refused to go to Philly . The fake fight was marketed as the real thing ,the swindle was discovered when spectators noticed the absence of Corbett in Ruhlin's corner.

    http://victorian-cinema.net/lubin
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    Still waiting!

    No response from you what a surprise.:lol:
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    Check out the Fitzsimmons v Ruhlin film thread!
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    I find it difficult to believe that a " man", could be as shameless as you obviously are Mendoza.
    No principles, no morals, no shame=Mendoza
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    Yes, it was filmed
    . I am correct, you are wrong as usual. You lie and have no honor. Nothing new here.:hi:
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    PS: Can you prove to us you have a 137 IQ as you stated here numerous times?
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've proved conclusively that it was not and I once again thank Adam for his information which removed any lingering doubt.

    Now, would you like to tell us the names of the posters that "you say" told you they have seen the Hague v Langford fight? And is it correct ,as Klompton says, that you stated it was Ted Spoon who showed you the fight? Because Ted pm'd me to say he hasn't seen it , he confused it with the Langford v Lang fight. You answered none of the questions put to you by either Klompton or myself and you won't.

    Because you are a compulsive liar ,and further more ,not even a convincing one. If you had any sense of personal dignity you would be embarrassed and ashamed of yourself.

    Honour is a word that should never pass your lips.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    I didn't state numerous times ,I answered a query from you. I took two IQ tests over 45years ago do you think I have a little plaque in my lounge?:patsch
    My partners IQ is higher than mine and I would think the teachers I listen to jazz with on Sundays would also have higher
    ratings than I it's no big deal either way. My mate in Thailand's IQ is over 150 and he is a member of Mensa.
    As I said before I think the test is pretty unreliable and I know my teacher friends ,like myself,don't set much store in it.

    Does it bother you because you're own IQ is sub-normal?
    My 5 years old grandson Mikey can read and write better than you!