Film Of The Langford v Hague Fight Question?

So, in other words, having a 137 IQ ( near genius level ) Can not be proven. It's a lie, just like the many you tell! Only a small percentage of people are at that level.

Anyone who bothers to read your drivel knows your far away from that number. You'd be lucky to reach 100! Now I see you're adding in new information, the saying was a long time ago. HAHA. That's what liars do. They keep changing their narrative. It must be difficult keeping track of all your lies. You have slipped before.

At one point you said you were married in a present tense here ( pre-board crash ), then, later on, you said you were divorced and that happened years ago.

It's your shame, what's evident is you don't care about it.


PS: I pity Mikey.

 

Typical Mendoza tactic: Cant answer the topic at hand so he changes the argument to an unrelated subject. Typical schoolyard debate tactics.

 

NO PROOF. LOL. You get owned by me here daily when it comes to boxing.

I'll retract the I pity Mikey comment as I was unaware of his condition.

Putting a photo on a computer screen is child's play. If you are as smart as you claim, you'd figure it out quickly.

 

Those are your tactics. In fact, you skip out often.

How can someone who doesn't know what he's watching prove what I saw? I was merely using some of his likely false boasts asking him to prove it. He can't. Point proved, and its highly unlikely he's as smart as he's claiming.

This thread proves nothing, but I urge you and Mcvey to buddy up! I did laugh at your comment to him, " You'll have more gold teeth than Johnson " a while back.:happy

 

For the record Fitzsimmons-Ruhlin wasnt filmed. The film of that fight was a Lubin reproduction filmed two days after the actual event just like McVey stated. I have photographs of Lubin filming the re-enactment on the roof of his building using the original participants.