I've got two problems with the Klitschko brothers 1) They don't fight with the mindset of a predator. They fight from a safety first mindset. 2) They've never been in an all-out war and came out on top.
Well, no. They are NOT within the rules. Holding and clinching is against the rules. The referee should warn them, take points away, and eventually disqualify.
To everything in life there are the written rules and there are the unwritten rules. A smart person follows the latter. A dope (you, Im sure) point to the book and appeal to others for justice that never comes. But this is partially why some people are winners, and some are bitter losers. Survival of the fittest.
They? Two brothers don't fight simultaneously in the ring. Vitali has nothing to do with this. When has Vitali ever held, leaning, pushed and generally stunk up the joint?
That´s true, Vitaly does not use that illegal tactics that excessively. He´s a fighter unlike his brother.
Sanders did land a few solid shots on Vitali and the crowd ooo'd and ah'd every time Sanders threw (and usually missed) with his big left. But to call this fight a shootout? I mean it was somewhat competitive in about three of the rounds. BUT I said WAR. And I mean Foreman-Lyle, Holmes-Norton, Moorer-Cooper...Neither of them have ever had their hearts and chins tested like that.
The Klitschkos are only full of steroids! Don't forget Vitali was caught as an amateur. Wlad was somewhere between third and fourth tiers in the past. Vitali bottom second. Maybe. Or between second and third. They don't have opponents. Imagine if Povetkin was closely ranked. :rofl But it isn't their fault. The real fraud is Golovkin who has opponents but wants to pick only losers.