Finally saw Ward-Kovalev. No robbery!

You obviously don't understand a rematch clause, and it's you that's missing the point, there is 1st off, no demand by anyone but Kovalev and his camp, and they would be making the same demand if he lost by 1st rd KO 12 rd dominant UD or, the way it went, a close fight. The rematch was going to happen. PERIOD if Kovalev lost, then manner in which he lost has no relevance.

 

I've always been smart enough to argue my point of view, and usually end up being right, if that's what you mean by thick. lol

 

His own daughter rips him. dafuq you mean. lol

 

Have no issue with this card, except 9-11. 9 and 11 were not close by any stretch of the word. rd 9 for instance was possibly Ward's most dominant round, and 11 was probably his 2nd most dominant rd. The=ose 2 rds were clear, w/ out a doubt. no chance they were Kova rounds. As far as rd 10, I had it the other way, but there is an argument, not a great one, but there is an argument for giving him that rd. 1 and 12 were pick em rds, I even said in the OP had no problem with anyone giving both to Kova. Don't agree, but no problem. Bottom line even the way you scored it it's still a close fight.

 

Then you have no clue what the H E double hockey sticks you are watching when you watch this sport. Ward did not appear hurt by any of Kov's punches in any rd. He even "bullied the bully" in rd 3.

 

I wouldn't call them clear Kovalev rds, lol.

 

Not sure how You could call 12 a clear Kovalev round. Could it be given to him, absolutely, but just as easily gone Ward's way. Toss up rd.

 

Ward outlanded Kov in the 11th, at the higher connect rate and had the more telling blows, "isn't out jabbed as badly". you do realize Ward out jabbed Kova in the 11th, right? 10 was close, and I've stated that quiet a few times, 11 not so much.