I bet you think mallinggi beat cotto too. The thing is a lot of people are so bias and mask them self as fans of sweet science smh
I can't wait for a rematch either, the first fight was amazing IMO. My card differs from yours... Kovalev - Ward 1: 10 - 9 2: 10 - 8 3: 9 - 10 4: 10 - 9 5: 9 - 10 6: 10 - 9 7: 9 - 10 8: 9 - 10 9: 9 - 10 10: 10 - 9 11: 9 - 10 12: 9 - 10 113 114 Kovalev Ward I agree with this. But to be honest, I don't care about breaking down the judges rounds, I care more about the correct result. My card is above.
2 punches? Or you can land 116 @ 34% to 126 @ 27%. 34% is way more effective, seeing as how it's only a 10 punch difference... you get my point.
Cool, I gave rounds 3 and 5 to Ward. Only round I changed on my second viewing was round 6, I gave it to Kovalev the 2nd time.
No, 34 percent of those punches are not as effective as the 27 percent of KOVAS. And he landed more,plus the headshots and power punches. Kova outlanded Ward in power punches for 8 rounds, Ward only landed More jabs than Kovalev by one round, and they are equal in rounds won by landed punches BUT Kovalev had the most total.
How cold you personally, after seeing it multiple times still gift ward round 12 ? you have it all even 104's and somehow (obviously just for you to have ward winning) gift round 12 to ward, fairly close round but as a whole round it's impossible to subjectively score it and have ward truly winning it. I see why you put only 15 seconds of round 12 in your breakdown , that's the only way one could claim that round could go to either, it can't . Clear Kovalev round, whatever makes you feel better is what you should tell yourself tho
If you give 2 rounds to ward in the first 6 and didn't manage to give kov 2 rounds in the last 6, you clearly have a preference on certain type, may be bias has a negative connotation to it.
I couldn't be bother to do a round by round breakdown as I have scored it the first time I see it, anybody who keep watching it several times to give justification rounds a certain fighter are skewed in their views.
The first 6 rounds could have been scored 6-0 and majority of people would have no problem with it. But I can accept a 5-1 as round 3 to 5 are close. The second half are 4-2 at best for ward.
I had Ward winning and guess what... on my second viewing I gave Kovalev another round. Am I skewed? Stupid.