Fireman Flynn KO 1 Jack Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Apr 15, 2014.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,235
    Feb 15, 2006
    It was certainly considered acceptable for a fighter to use it, in Jeffries day.
     
  2. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I would like to see a cross section of people who think this was fixed vs people who think Gans-McGovern was a fix.
     
  3. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Common sense dictates that...
     
  4. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    On ESB, there is a vast difference by many posters who never criticize the great legacy of the Old Master Joe Gans, for being
    ko'd by a FW Terry McGovern, whilst they rather clinically bring up the 1 round ko of Jack Dempsey by Jim Flynn as an indication
    of Jack Dempsey's ineptness...Why one and not the other ?
    Because Dempsey is a target by some posters that a Sigmund Freud could have explained, but alas he is dead...
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Because Terry McGovern is one of the most deadly KO artists in boxing history and Flynn is a journeyman.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,235
    Feb 15, 2006
    Definitely.

    Once you assert it one way or the other, you effectively assume the burden of proof, and that is going to be very hard to meet here.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    There's actually very little proof for a lot of things in history that happened in the shadows.

    For example, Al Capone and other giant almost mythical crime figures of the period : If you threw out all the rumours, innuendo, possible gross exaggerations, fabrications and legend, and relied only on proof, we'd probably be left with some modestly successful tax-dodgers who have very little to do with violence.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Al was a good guy, he gave away turkeys to the poor at Xmas

    As did Don King.:good
    I don't have any pressing need to find a solution to the original question ,either way it wouldn't change my ranking of Dempsey one iota.
     
  9. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,448
    1,824
    Sep 9, 2011
    ko1 both ways is a bit suspicious, but taking into account how dempsey fought and the progress of their careers they're not the most unlikely results for those fights.

    the better argument's been made by the no fix camp, but i wouldn't come down solidly on either side.
     
  10. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    U, I believe that is stretching the ****ogy a bit. Al Capone was no Mother Teresa for sure...
     
  11. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    True, but on the other hand Joe Gans a ring immortal, was a lightweight great who had success against bigger greats like Joe Walcott and Jack Blackburn...The shocking ko of Gans the LW champ by FW McGovern in 1900 was comparable if say Roberto Duran would be flattened by the hard punching featherweight Sandy Saddler...Truly shocking...On the other hand who truly knows what occurred that day, but Terry McGovern at his best, before his disaster at the hands of his tormentor Young Corbett was as Nat Fleischer opined the greatest FW in history...
    But like Dempsey/Flynn #1, Jake LaMotta/ Billy Fox, Ali/ Liston
    the real truth lies hidden...
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,366
    21,814
    Sep 15, 2009
    I don't whether pigs are about to fly past my window but I'm quite happy to assume they aren't.
     
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Nor was Mother Teresa, probably ....
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,235
    Feb 15, 2006
    Yes but you have never seen a pig fly, nor read any documented account of one flying, and have good reason to believe that it would be physically impossible for them to fly.

    These factors constrain your prediction somewhat.

    When it comes to the question of whether Jack Dempsey took a dive against Fireman Flynn, both answers are very compatible with the limited known evidence.
     
  15. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    What evidence is there that Dempsey took a dive? The word of one or two Dempsey sycophants nearly a decade after the events trying to make him look better, which Dempsey himself refuted? Thats pretty thin when the light of the actual ringside accounts illuminates the subject.

    Basically the only evidence that Dempsey took a dive is fanboys who dont want to believe it saying "Dempsey was super tough, Jim Flynn could have never stopped him."
     
    Letseatshitfordinner likes this.