Five Frazier Missed As Champ

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Aug 29, 2013.


  1. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007
    MSG tried to match up Frazier and Patterson as Frazier's first defense post-FOTC, but Floyd wouldn't come to terms. Can't say I blame Floyd, he knew what would happen.

    The FOTC took a tremendous amount out of Frazier. He was never the same afterward. Durham advised him to retire. He should have.

    I think it is ridiculous and also petty that some of you are finding fault with the Frazier camp for sitting on the title a bit post-FOTC.
     
  2. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,376
    12,719
    Mar 2, 2006
    So we're going to continue down the sewer, huh? Nothing constructive but to tell me I should examine boxing history closer. OK, I'll bite. Poor Joe, it was such a rough fight. But tell me, wasn't Ali in that fight too? What did he do in '71 and '72? I'll tell you what he wasn't doing. Touring with his group 'The Knockouts' and having a good old time. Cost Joe dearly in January of '73, didn't it?
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    As you say Frazier would have beaten both Patterson and Terrell,and inside the distance.
    He would have honed his skills against rated contenders, and had two rated challengers on his resume as champion.
    The problem with Frazier's fans is ,with the event of his sad death he has become some sacred icon .
    Any attempt to objectively examine his reign is met with this protective defence reflex,as you state ," circle the wagons".

    Fans of his become personally incensed when it is pointed out that he did not defend against a rated contender for two years , crying "give the guy a break". How about the break deserving contenders did not get?

    nb After challenging Frazier, Daniels lost his next five fights, had a total of 39 after the challenge winning just 7 of them.
    Stander won just one of his next seven fights , and that against a man with no verifiable form whatsoever.

    I'm not at all surprised that Yancey has leapt to the forefront ,foaming at the mouth , but then he never had any credibility to start with.
    He asserts that Frazier was past prime for FOTC!

    However I'm a little dissapointed that Houdini has churlishly stooped to personal insults..
    I had thought better of him.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    THE TIMESCALE IS TWO YEARS. NAME ANOTHER CHAMPION IN THE LAST FIFTY YEARS WHO DID NOT DEFEND AGAINST A RATED CONTENDER FOR THAT PERIOD.:patsch
     
  5. Ipay4leavingNot

    Ipay4leavingNot Active Member Full Member

    954
    4
    Jun 30, 2013
    Beats all with ease except Liston. Liston was a big banger, but never had a iron chin, a good chin, a good enough chin to take blows from 99% of boxers and be unfazed, but that 6 inch punch from frazier on the inside would wobble his legs. Joe is a great fighter, he knows where to hit you, when to hit you, how hard to hit you. He'll tap you to the body with a left hook and then when you drop your right hand nail you with his hardest left hook punch in the head. and drill a right uppercut to your liver, the man was dangerous. It would be a great fight. But Liston would lose.

    Joe taught Norton, so forget that one.

    Lyle was good, but he had trouble with shavers, he ain't beating joe
     
  6. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Actually, Stander, though not the least bit special, wasn't all that bad, as far as soft touches are concerned.

    He had victories over some credible names (green Shavers, Thad Spencer, and Manuel Ramos (x2). Decent enough scalps to have for someone who was fighting primarily in the Midwest. Plus, he actually gave Frazier a decent enough fight, all things considered...even buckling him pretty badly with a nice right hand. There have been worse heavyweight challengers, all things considered.

    I think the main reason why people lump Stander in with Daniels (who was about as deserving of a title shot as any no-hoper one could possibly name), is that his challenge occurred after the Daniels fight. Had it occurred immediately after FOTC, I think it would have been considered an acceptable follow-up, given the hell that Frazier had gone through in the previous fight. As it was, it was still a step up in terms of quality from Mutt...just not as large a step up as many would have liked to have seen.
     
  7. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Norton, Lyle and Garcia were nobodies when Joe was on top of the heavyweight division. Why fight these guys for pennies(comparatively) when you can fight(and rematch) Quarry, Foreman and Ali for tens of millions.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Norton, Lyle, and Garcia were rated contenders during Fraziers reign. Daniels, and Stander were not, they were the nobodies.
    The Quarry rematch was not a title defence, the first fight was only for the NYSAC title.
    Frazier never received tens of millions for any fight . Frazier and Ali split $5000,000 for the FOTC. Frazier made around $3000,000 from the Manila fight . Frazier got $875,000 for the first Foreman fight Foreman $375,000 and Joe received $1000, 000 for the rematch.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    After the draining FOTC Frazier might have been cut some slack for a gimme defence , but to tie up the title for two years ,defending against unranked boxers is too much slack imo.

    The fact that Stander was game and fought his heart out in no way excuses the fact that he was unranked and therefore undeserving of a title shot.
     
  10. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    :patsch
    I was talking about all of them combined.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Then you are still wrong aren't you.:nono