Floyd admits he doesn't care if he never fights Pacquiao

i'm simply asking why floyd mentioned ali being forced to fight fights the public wants to see him with when asked of a pacquiao fight. can't you answer a simple question or would you rather this be a thread where you are talking about my ass, cellz?

 

another delusional fanboy!

 

wow! but you were cheering floyd's twitter call to pacquiao then? you have selective memory when it comes to floyd cellz.

 

atsch anyone who doesnt know what Ali fight floyd was referring to is clearly a ******. floyd wasnt talking about the Ali that fought Foreman and Frazier. he was talking about the WASHED UP past prime Ali continuing to fight fighters like Holmes and Spinks and taking unnecaessary punishment way past his prime u ****in ******. everyone would agree that he didnt belong in the ring at that time. do u follow boxing history. hes talking about hes not gnna be fight when hes washed up. have u ever seen a floyd interview? he says random **** all the time.

do u think Ali should have been in the ring against spinks and Holmes at that age? look at him now, he has parkinsons. ****, u *******s are annoying as hell and dont know how to interpret **** or think logical. u just recycle the same **** over and over.

 

what does a comment on twitter have to do with ur shitty copy and paste post of yours, *******? :rofl

 

Cellz831 is a troll, comprehension is the last thing you can get from this person

 

This guy doesn't seem to be able to comprehend that even (hypothetically speaking) if Floyd was ducking, he'd NEVER EVER admit that he was ducking.

 

ok i'll bite your version of floyd's story.

then so youa re asaying that floyd thinks of himself as past-prime and it would be terribly dangerous for him to take on someone like pacquiao?

pacquiao is slipping faster than floyd is. more ring wars, ring age and a style not suited for longevity.

 

:roflatsch oh my god this guy is delusional

 

you can answer the same question mate.


ok i'll bite your version of floyd's story.

then so you are saying that floyd thinks of himself as past-prime and it would be terribly dangerous for him to take on someone like pacquiao?

pacquiao is slipping faster than floyd is. more ring wars, ring age and a style not suited for longevity.

 

i see, you can't answer. as usual form cellz

 

exactly. Floyd is too WAY too self centered for that. he doesnt even give his dad props. this puga guy thinks he will say hes scared of pac? on national TV? atsch

 

cellz says that floyd's own words is subject to interpretation. so is floyd's words now the bible or some kind of an abstract painting?

 

ill play your game and copy and paste, read this again and again until it sinks in your delusional wishful thinking mind.

atsch anyone who doesnt know what Ali fight floyd was referring to is clearly a ******. floyd wasnt talking about the Ali that fought Foreman and Frazier. he was talking about the WASHED UP past prime Ali continuing to fight fighters like Holmes and Spinks and taking unnecaessary punishment way past his prime u ****in ******. everyone would agree that he didnt belong in the ring at that time. do u follow boxing history. hes talking about hes not gnna be fight when hes washed up. have u ever seen a floyd interview? he says random **** all the time.

do u think Ali should have been in the ring against spinks and Holmes at that age? look at him now, he has parkinsons. ****, u *******s are annoying as hell and dont know how to interpret **** or think logical. u just recycle the same **** over and over.

 

I'm actually done arguing about this, it's getting seriously ridiculous and just ******ed.