Floyd BLEW it! No PBF vs Pac fight, If history repeats itself, PAC will AVOID PBF!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MIP4P1, Sep 23, 2009.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    this thread is a waste of time:nut:roll:
     
  2. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    ****in schizophrenic...why are you talking to yourself?:rofl

    we all know that you and nallege and this other guy are the same person:lol:
     
  3. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    What history of Pac avoiding are you even talking about.

    You make rambling posts seem like great works of English literature.

    Your logic is more flawed than Creationists.

    Personally, I don't even care for Pac Money that much, I've always wanted to see Floyd come back against the welters.

    I guess if history repeats itself there we can look forward to Floyd fighting the elderly or former fighters of the 130-140 pound division.

    Or if there was history to repeat, make a fight at a catch weight and then break it on the night before the weigh in.
     
  4. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,584
    14,086
    Mar 5, 2006
    I agree Pac would probably get exposed by slicksters especially 147 pound slicksters. I thnk he's fair game against the 135-140 pound slicksters. Thus he should fight Bradley, Holt and Alexander.

    Guzman and Nate Campbell could go ahead and fight floyd for their big money fights.
     
  5. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
  6. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    if pac beats cotto senseless with no sweat and destroys him like a bug, would you find another excuse as to why pac beat him? like shopworn old dehydrated excuse?

    i bet you'll be shitting your pants if that happens. it just means that pac might have a chance to beat mayweather:lol::lol::lol:
     
  7. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    That is just a convenient way of being an idiot. His other handle makes a stupid post, then he will agree. Now, if there was a spelling error, the other handles will correct it once more intelligent poster note it.

    Ntoice how MIp would make a thread with so many grammatical errors, then suddenly nallege and his other handle would then sing agreement in unison like puppets. They even have the guts to announce one of themn have the making to be a writer. Although "feature writer" as a term do exists, so I do not see the reason why they need to correct it.
     
  8. stiga

    stiga Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    May 27, 2009
    pacman want to fight mayweather...as far the morales issues, pacman didn't duck raheem beacuse he is not lightweight at that time and morales agree that the fight will be at 130, sanchez was such dirty fighter which pacman underestimated...guzman happens at wrong time when pacman finally decide to moved up:-:)-(
     
  9. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    You have only been on here a few days and you already have more posts then me............get a girlfriend.

    It's funny how Mayweather beats Marquez and then all the sudden the Floyd fanatics come on here talking abot "all the *******s are scared now" "Pac dosent want to see mayweather" "Pac has no skill" bla bla bla.

    Mayweather was getting tagged up by Hatton quite alot in their fight. Pac wasn't hit with a single flush shot. De La hoya was also beating mayweather in quite a few rounds.......Pac didn't loose a single round.

    I think Mayweather won a good fight against marquez. Showed he still has all the old tools and is still the man to beat, but seriously....Hopefully Pac and Mayweather will meet and we will see who gets their hand raised in the end, but until it happens..................Please shut up with these stupid pac hate threads of yours, you are annoying as all hell.
     
  10. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    Finally, a Pacquiao fan with some sense! :good
     
  11. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    It'd be good to see Floyd take the same challenge...
     
  12. dits

    dits Active Member Full Member

    1,011
    0
    Oct 7, 2007
    First, I dont get the argument that Arum is gonna get Pac avoid PBF. With Pac near retirement, wouldn't it make sense for him to squeeze him for all the money he can possibly make off of him? And is there even another money making main event bigger than PBF-Pac?

    Second, Pac won't duck PBF out of preference. He believes he's the best and he isn't one to shy away from a challenging or dangerous fight. He wouldn't have fought JMM or ODLH otherwise.

    Third, PBF defeated a game JMM who is fighting two divisions above his current weight. Give PBF his due, that was a masterful performance but you gotta get a little perspective here. Its not like he beat a top 5 welterweight or even junior welterweight. He fought a lightweight. A champion, a top p4per but still, a lightweight.

    I'm not gonna say that Pac's 100% gonna beat PBF. PBF's bigger and stylewise counterpunchers have been shown to give Pac trouble. But his performance from the past few years have proven that you don't count the Pacman out til the final bell rings.
     
  13. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    fraudettes are rejoicing as if pbf-jmm was victory of some significance. it was a great tune-up. :lol::rofl

    120-107. great tune up? :lol::lol::lol:
     
  14. WAYKURAT

    WAYKURAT Active Member Full Member

    776
    0
    Feb 18, 2009

    i think pac should fights you idiot...so that when you wake up, pac vs mayweather already done....
     
  15. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    :|:|:|:|:|
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.