Floyd Deserves 60-40 Against Pac...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sp550i, Jun 21, 2010.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    when Pac vs Cotto outsold Floyd vs Marquez, Floyd would never have accepted less than 50/50.
     
  2. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    since you know it all what over factors in the negotiations have team pac agreed to that give mayweather the advantage?
     
  3. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Spud stop hurting yourself
     
  4. Spman20999

    Spman20999 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    The obvious solution is obvious. 60 to the winner, 40 to the looser. The Pacquiao camp should make that offer and force Floyd into a corner. If he is so damn sure he is going to win then why refuse such an offer? No wonder the guy isn't fighter of the decade, he rarely wants to fight anybody...
     
  5. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010

    the fact is, you go off their last fights to se who is the bigger draw

    the fact remains floyd doubled pacs last fight

    what does that tell you:hi:
     
  6. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    no you dont:lol::lol:

    seriously babatunde learn about boxing before opening your dick sucker.
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    no, you don't
     
  8. sp550i

    sp550i Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,149
    95
    Dec 8, 2009
    what does greatness have to do with anything? if tyson came back and fought klitscko tyson would get the bigger share... RIGHT NOW

    think about what your saying... if manny didn't get 60-40 against oscar because he was smaller and his position on the p4p charts..

    what does that say about the split against floyd.... if he's smaller he deserves less than 40? cmon man.. your trpipping

    I'm not talking about greatness... **** greatness... I'm talking about ppv splits here.... oscar was washed the **** up against floyd & pacman and he still got a bigger share
     
  9. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Ok, answer this. If Floyd's next fight was a ppv against Nate Campbell, who Floyd asked to come up to 147, and Pacquiaos next fight was against Paul Williams, and Pacs fight does better than Floyds fight, would you say that Pac is a bigger draw than Mayweather?
     
  10. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

     
  11. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    LOL you're obviously unable to understand waht I'm saying.

    When Pac fought Oscar. Oscar was easily 3 or 4 times the draw that Pac was. Yet the split was 2:1. How can you explain that? Think about it

    Oscar was a much bigger draw. But because, like Floyd will have, Oscar had a size advantage; because, like Floyd will be, Oscar was fighting a greater fighter than him, because of those things... Pac's share was bigger than what was represented by the difference in their drawing power.
     
  13. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010

    but the fatc is he doubled pacs numbers, so dont try and twist im not talking hypothetically because you dont even understand the reality
     
  14. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Answer the question spud, stop avoiding it. In that scenario, who would you consider the bigger draw? Especially since, according to you, your judged by your last fight.
     
  15. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010