Floyd fans, does this change your mind on the Pac-Floyd breakdown? (Bill?)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Mar 11, 2010.


  1. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007

    Floyd requested USADA\WADA testing to be done.

    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf

    There it is in black and white.

    I came online and showed an official document to back up my comments. You have shown exactly nothing. LukeO, schooled yet again.

    Clearly, quoting reporters and broadcasters (which you did not even do btw) is better than showing the official document from the agency that was asked to conduct the tests. Clearly..... because everything reported on by the media\broadcasters is absolutely true. :nut
     
  2. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
  3. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    I don't care what people in boxing say. I care what the agency in charge of conducting the tests say.

    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf

    Boxers aren't exactly the most educated bunch, that is why they are fighters. I would not expect them to know the details of the WADA testing method. Besides the fact that they are not the ones administering the test.

    LOL at your moronic google search. That is your evidence? A search containing Mayweather and Tablespoon? ROFLMAO... you are clearly the RESEARCH KING!!! HAHAHAHHAHA -- I am done with you...I do not know whether to laugh or feel sorry for you because you are such an idiot.

    One last time so people can know how ****ing stubborn and idiotic you are: http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf
    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf
    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf
    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf
    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf
     
  4. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    So you care when they mention USADA but not when they mention the amount of blood given at the drug tests they are doing.

    Interesting logic, little boy.
     
  5. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Yes
     
  6. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Are you really this ****ing stupid? I do not see how that is ****ing possible. Do you work at your local 7-11? McDonald's? Seriously.....


    Do you not understand what a "standard" is?? Are you really that ****ing dense?

    A company does not create standards so they can follow them when they feel like it or not. It is universal. A standard, or protocol, is something that has to be done a specific way. When you deviate from the standard\protocol, the test\method becomes invalid.

    You are quoting boxers who are not involved with the drug testing from the USADA\WADA in any way.

    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf

    That is the "standard" for collecting a blood sample. Go back to ****ing school kid, seriously.
     
  7. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    You can chant your wada mantra until the end of ****ing days.

    You're saying the guy who brought up the USADA and not WADA makes sense when he says who they are, but he is incapable of understanding how much blood is drawn when they explain the drug tests to him.
    He knows the human body has 380 TABLESPOONS of blood, but not how much they take from you.
    He made that math up in his head to trick guys like you into calling him out online over the fact that he has no idea how to measure liquid.

    Get over yourself, you immature stubborn kid.
     
  8. PBA

    PBA Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,670
    5
    Jan 11, 2010
    OK genius let's all use your logic in future and do no drug tests on any athlete because "they wouldn't be stupid enough to use it in case they got caught anyway".
     
  9. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Yes. Clearly that was my point.

    You're very intelligent.
     
  10. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    This doesn't really matter right now though, because you all can bet your ass the testing will be on 24/7 series for all to see them both doing it and exactly how it fails to affect their energy
     
  11. PBA

    PBA Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,670
    5
    Jan 11, 2010
    That's ridiculous. Going to 14 days is enough, like somebody said it becomes useless if it goes any further. Nd considering ROach initially said 5 days trying to call the Mays bluff, it's even more stupid.

    If that's the case maybe Mayweather could have changed it to a 10 million penalty for every 20 pounds he was overweight.
     
  12. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Why do the *******s *never* address this point?
     
  13. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    It is perfectly reasonable, all the dates are.
    Still doesn't prove anyone is cheating.
     
  14. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007

    The type of equipment used to draw blood relates to the amount of blood needed to be taken.

    http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/GuidelinesBloodSample_unmarked.pdf

    That is what they say in their document.



    This is the method they use for blood drawing according to their document.

    [ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venipuncture[/ame]

    They do not use a "syringe." It is a needle with a vacuum tube connected to it with an anti-coagulant solution in the tube.

    They mention the "fingerstick" method can be used to draw "minute quantities" or blood. So the real question is whether or not 3 mL is considered a "minute quantity."

    Either way, the methods described are the equivalent of a "pin *****" unless they go with the syringe.
     
  15. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    :good thanks