MAB-PAc rematch was justified. Simply because MAB was favoured to win the first fight and it was a huge upset. MAB rebounded and people were calling for this rematch for years. In Floyds case he wants a rematch against an old inactive legend who he already defeated and a smaller Hatton who he defeated clearly and Hatton hasnt even won any fights after FM.
mab-pac rematch was not justified, MAB was already on the slide the back to back losses to Jr jones were he took a lot of shots and the war with Morales and Kenny McKenny and the many fights in between had already put too many miles on MAB odometer, the man was 29 but looked as though he was 35.
Yea everyone was calling for that fight Floyd-Baldo :rofl Floyd lost 4 or 5 rounds to Zab. You got the fights confused, Cotto dominated every round with Zab and it was Cotto who beat him up and down from pillar to post and knocked him the **** out. The only reason Zab "won" few rounds with Cotto was because he managed to stun him a few times (in rounds that he was losing) and Floyd might also stun Cotto a few times before he gets KTFO.
After he lost to PAc (which was a HUGE upset) MAB went on to defeat Erik Morales convincingly this time and Erik went on to beat Pac, MAB also went on a 6 fight win streak and won belts in the process. This justifies the rematch.
zab won 4 clear rounds, and even dropped him once...but they didnt count it.... if that fight would've been stopped in the 10th round cause of rogers dumbass, it wouldn't of been a robbery for floyd, cause in my eyes, zab had clearly won 4, and there was one close round that i didnt really score.....plus if the knockdown would've counted, it would've been a victory for zab...... you gotta take all these what if's into consideration in this fight, cause it was alot closer then what people really though......but since it's floyd, his fanboys will always have it 120-108 :deal
You couldn't possibly edit that any better for Judah, ay? And hows the question marks at the end after the decision's been annouced, as if it was a bad decision or something? Still maintain that the low blow (one of the most blatant I've ever seen) was to escape a KO loss... Gotta love Floyd's composure throughout the ENTIRE melee afterwards though. :good And he was probably the only one that had a legitimate reason to be angry!
i was only talking about that knockdown, i could care less for the rest....... i was trying to point out that if the fight would've been stopped in judah's favor (roger broke the rules bigtime), there would have been no argument with juday winning the fight.....why, cause floyd wasn't dominating ****...... if everything would've went how it was supposed to that night, judah would've won by dq, but also on the cards he was up by atleast 1 point.....with the knockdown being scored :deal
:huh Floyd was up 6-3 at worst (6-2-1 maybe). That's 86-84 including the point deduction for the knockdown. Officially 87-84. And isn't there a 2 point deduction for blatant fouls like that? Round 10 coulda easilly been a 10-7 round for Mayweather if that was the case. Furthermore, the ref had clearly called time before Roger jumped into the ring. So no DQ either. Funny how an off balance shot where Mayweather's glove touches the canvas, of all things, is one of the main things people can use to bring him down (career wise, anyhow)