Floyd had no intention of causing damage to Manny Pacquiao, it was never gonna be anything more than a safe, tactical padding of the scorcards, without ever moving either his arms or feet out of a defensive mode long enough to inflict any kind of offense, thus gaurenteeing a non-event fight. For Floyd to do this is an astronomical disservice to the Boxing public, who've longed for the "fight of the century" fervently for six years. One thing is clear: Floyd's play-it-safe, non-combatant defenseive posturing can nullify (on official scorecards anyways) ANY fighters offense. He has the supreme ability to inflict enough long-range love taps without ever straying from a defensive position long enough to force judges to score rounds for him. It's a monumental slap in the face for any fans. Sure, the old 'hit and not get hit' argument, but fans of mayweather consistently fail to provide a coherent appraisal of his virtue as a fighter. They can't. Mayweather is but a virtuous NON-combatant, if such a paradox could exist. What great fighter in history has their signature, devastating finishing move known as 'long-range pot-shotting'. They wouldn't. Cause no fighter would ever be proud of such a skill. It's the tools of a coward.
I like James Toney a lot. I recently saw an interview with him talking about the brain damage he's received in the ring.
He's an old grandmaster at this stage in his career. He fights in the same manner as the greatest of pugilists like Gans, Benny, Packey, Pep and Sweet pea. His ring generalship is really on another level, the way he can suffocate opponents punches, his elusiveness in the pocket or from distance, the way he clenches in holds and knows exactly how to wrap up his oppositions arms effectively, the way he's able to spin his opposition around when he's pressed on the ropes for uncomfortably long periods of time. All this ring experience he's picked up in his almost 20 years as a pro has added on to his ring generalship. If you saw him at the lighterweights, you'd know he wasn't a potshotting type of fighter. It wasn't really until he became a PPV star that he became a lot more cautious with his offense. Maybe it was his plan all along, to prolong his time as the PPV king and milk out as much money as he possibly could. But since becoming a POV star in 2007, it's not like he's fought tomato cans. Everyone he's fought was either universally recognized as a top 10 fighter P4P or worse case, a top 2-3 fighter in the division at the time he fought them. I'm pretty sure he's beaten around 6 or 7 HOF bound fighters since his fight with DLH in 2007. He's changed his style from the lighter weights to help prolong his career and he's done an incredible job with it. As you so eloquently put it, he can nullify ANYONE's offense. it's not up to him to make the fight, it's up to the opposition. Maidana brought the fight to him in their first match and was rewarded with a rematch and another big payday. At this point, people need to accept he's probably not going to lose and just to let him retire quietly into the next chapter in his life after he picks up his 50th win.
He can nullify anyone's offense so long as the third man in the ring - after having been compensated nicely - prohibits any and all infighting - nicely according to script as determined by Mayweather-Ellerbe-Haymon. Another über-cowardly stipulation is to write in the contract to take away even perfectly legal gloves that might give an opponent an edge. Stipulate an enormous ring size for maximum escape routes for the track star masquerading as a pugilist. Oh, and stipulations prohibiting a routine treatment that Manny requested for the bum shoulder. Stipulations. Padding scorecards. Rigid, excessive demands within contracts. Rigging the local boxing system illegally with corrypt promoters masquerading as "advisers"
in other words, :|:|:| Manny got schooled 118-110 This content is protected Stop writing essays. It's bad enough you haven't let go yet.