Floyd is NOT a World Class Athlete...

A myth right?

This content is protected

"

This content is protected

The detection method for EPO is valid and reliable."

This content is protected

"

This content is protected

This report, requested by WADA’s stakeholders and commissioned by the Agency to evaluate the validity of urinary and blood tests for detecting the presence of recombinant EPO,

This content is protected

"

 

Do you even know what screening is ?

EPO and HGH are natural you idiot. All steroids are natural. Created in the body.

Everyone has EPO and HGH in their bodies. The only way to tell people are cheating is to measure the levels of it (screen) to see whether it's above normal levels or not.

They use blood to decide whether the levels are above natural. Then if they are, they use urine to decide how it got there.

You do a urine test to detect HGH, everyone will have it in their system. The actual test is the levels of it that are there.

You lift a weight in the gym, your HGH levels will increase numb nuts!

 

Pacquiao agreed to a much stricter testing regimen than what Shane had to undergo when he was cheating. However, Flyod still refused to accept.

 

Man, I don't know how many times to explain this ****.

1: This test isn't used anywhere. The urine test in boxing is a screening test, not this.

2: Screening is the entire point anyway. Everyone has EPO and HGH in their bodies. You screen people to see whether they have abnormal levels or not. You then urine test to find out how it got there.

 

That's not the point.

The point is he was demanding circumstances that still gave him a window to cheat if he wanted to.

Who demands nearly a month of guaranteed "no testing". As in nothing. Urine or blood?

 

Pot meet kettle, perhaps you may want to do some "research". I will concede you are right about one thing "blinded haters, they will always find a way to hate no matter what." These are links from medical news today, science daily, and the doping journal that respectfully disagree with your position.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/38295.php

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080626100921.htm

http://dopingjournal.org/content/3/1/dopingj022006-01.html

 

I swear, it's an American thing.

Europeans are used to drug cheats beating any test you want them to beat, that isn't full random blood and urine testing. They've been doing it for decades. See Shane Mosely

 

Perhaps you should broaden your horizons in terms of information, just a suggestion.

 

I would argue that he is not even a ducker, he is a degenerate low life, that had he not been born with his boxing talent he would be incarcerated. (which he may get there anyways)

 

The only position in sport is that the only way to catch drug cheats is by FULL random testing, both blood and random.

In fact, in athletics and cycling you are random tested 350 days a year. They only give a you a few guaranteed days when they can't turn up at your door. As many think that people can still cheat if they're not tested literally every month of the year, whether they're competing or not.

Pacland's response is to just google various words, find various quotes that have next to nothing to do with the subject.

There are urine tests to detect EPO, but they aren't used anywhere. Not even in athletics. They take too long, and cost too much. The much more efficient way is to blood/urine it.

Boxing certainly don't use them. They only use a urine screening test. The cheapest of the cheap. When Pacquiao was saying he wanted urine tests, he was saying he wanted the same tests Mosely had............Not super modern, new stuff.

Anyway, that's not even the point.

There's hundreds of designer drugs, that can only be found by blood. Including HGH.

That's why blood is used. As it catches everything.

 

Floyd is a piece of ****, accept it and move on with it, the more you ignorant *******s ride his dick the more you are setting back the sport

 

none of those articles say that EPO cannot be detected in urine.

the first one says that the detection method can lead to false-positives. Meaning even if the guy is clean, the test can think he is dirty.

the second one says that certain labs do not apply the testing procedure properly.

the third one says the same as the first.