Floyd Jr. needs to KO Pacquiao to win the fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nopporn, Nov 30, 2011.


  1. IRONFIST178

    IRONFIST178 Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Sep 4, 2011
    (Sigh).............*******s on the loose
     
  2. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    Rustico Torrecampo and Singsurat were able to KO Pac but Floyd Can't? give me a break.

    Erik Morales and JMM was able to outbox Pacquiao but Floyd Can't? Give me break

    - That is your own logic
     
  3. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    That's not my logic, that's yours. There's a difference between KO and not being able to win a single round.

    And seriously, Rustico Torrecampo and Singsurat ??
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,153
    85,030
    Nov 30, 2006
    You conveniently left out the ATG Victor Ortiz, who you had up...what, 4-0 at the time he got KTFO (on what should have been a disqualification in your book)?

    Who's the one whose opinion sucks here? :think ESB? Can we get a ruling on this?
     
  5. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    If he actually had Ortiz up 4-0 he is a total idiot. Mayweather was up 4 - 0 IMO.
     
  6. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Huh?? :huh What r u even talking about. I've never even posted a scorecard for that fight. And I'd give Ortiz maybe 1 of those 4 rounds at best, and I've never said the KO should have been a DQ I've said the exact opposite actually. It was a legal shot and Victor didn't protect himself, end of story.
     
  7. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    Pac is getting stopped anyway
     
  8. jan_fan

    jan_fan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,990
    0
    Sep 28, 2011
    Whatever....:blabla
     
  9. evilsherwin

    evilsherwin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    dude, this guy ib hates 99.99% percent of pac fans. I wouldnt b surprised if hed make **** up like that.
     
  10. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    1,741
    Jan 4, 2007
    Those bribed judges should be suspended. This can cause Pacquiao v.s. Floyd another delay because nobody wants to get robbed.
     
  11. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,955
    3,312
    Apr 26, 2010
    Floyd will walk him down, bully him, and win going away.
     
  12. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,955
    3,312
    Apr 26, 2010
    It's a no brainer dude.
     
  13. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,955
    3,312
    Apr 26, 2010
    He's not God, or anything close to it. But he's head and shoulders better than Manny...obviously.
     
  14. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    No. He's better at what he does, whether he's a better fighter is debatable. Your just a nuthugger.
     
  15. Dementia Pugulistica

    Dementia Pugulistica Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,103
    1,265
    Nov 24, 2005
    I disagree. Anti Pacman sentiment after another close fight with Marquez will work for Floyd imo. If Manny (a foreigner ) doesn't completely dominate Floyd ( usa born and bred) then he is in for a loss. This situation makes me think of the first Lewis / Holyfield fight. The judges had more than just the fight in mind when they scored it. The same will happen this time around. Everyone should be prepared for a dissappointing outcome. Maybe a no decision due to accidental head butt caused cut, a scoring "error" or some other such nonsense. So I think that the only way Manny wins is if he ko's PBF, and after seeing how much trouble he has with counter punchers I can't see that happening.