Sawadee in the morning Krab Khun Boran BKK. I understand you clearly sir. What I'm trying to do here is just to compare and contrast both styles which are very different. In fact, I don't seriously ask which one is better than the other because it totally depends on what you prefer. It's just a kind of asking your opinion for this discussion. Nothing is so serious. But it's not a trolling thread anyway.
Manny his fighting style means his prime is shorter and he declines faster. floyd is much more continuous because he receives less damage.
Good thread. great balanced post and then a idiot had to **** all over. Way to go Boxing(Pacquiao)Fanatic. You sir have just won the "I ****ed up a good thread, again" award of the day. And your prize is a good swift kick to the nads. But sadly it was discovered you had none. Congrats and good day.
Floyd's style is technically beautiful and flawless, he's the Federer of boxing. Manny is Nadal, ugly but effective and very powerful like an animal. (only difference is Federer is more offensive than Nadal)
yes and no. technically floyd is better but manny is more entertaining. i think pac would win in a street fight.
floyd at 140 and 135 was better then the young hungry come forward relentless pressure fighter of a young manny pacquiao because floyd was the poster child of "hit and not get hit" ... older manny is possibly the worst of both theres styles all put togather... old manny is some gunshy boxer who really hasent got alot of boxing IQ to be fighting that way floyd picks apart his opponent with beautiful counter punching that if you are a fan of boxing you will def appreciate