Floyd Jr vs Willie Pep. defense

So basically you haven't seen crap or probably even less than me. 2 fights. Hell i seen clips of multiple fights and all were just decently impressive. You are as solid as nothing. Provide me some links and i'll probably still won't be impressed bc the guy is just overated. His footage is mediocre, his record is medicore so he is probably medicore. You seen two fights and u have the nerve to say that his fighters are all better than floyds. What a joke. The only thing that hold any ground is ur post. you sound like u know what ur talking about by throwing some names > floyd opponents but yet in ur first paragraph you expose urself as only seen two fights.:tired clearly you don't know crap. On paper floyd's opponents are a lot more accomplished than pep's. And check pep's opponents records too and they also fought 90% bums. guys back then have barely an amatuer background and half of them doesn't even know how to fight but standing there and duke it out. you sound smart but your full of crap.

 

They record speaks for itself just like my fight night record. One look at my record on "fight night" would tell you that you can't f**k with me. If i see a guy's "fight night" record with a low aol (average opponent level) and have a ton of wins then what do you think he is? OVERATED. you dumbass. everything you post is false.

 

u don't know crap about boxing and you don't know crap about fight night. fight night is ranked on a points system. The better people you fight. the more points you get. If you fight a bum you get 1 point. Now look at my record along with the other top ten. first you should notice that i have the fewest amount of fights (much like floyd) but against high quality people and i'm ranked 8 (high aol). While the rest are overated and fought much much more to rank high (much like pep). Simple equation in life. If you fought majority bums, you will have a good record but overated.:--( some people are just so dumb beyond belief. http://www.easportsworld.com/en_US/leaderboard leunghungfist is me

 

Just bc one have more fights doesn't mean they are better. perfect example. we'll take fight night 4 leaderboard for instance. http://www.easportsworld.com/en_US/leaderboard who do you guys think is the best player in the top 10? most likely not going to lose?

 

ESB is already overun by dumbass posters. Nothing new and will never change bc majority of the people doesn't have the ability to think. They are followers. like cattle.

Yea lets round up all the idiots and start a committee.

 

Makes sense but is no use. They are clearly idiots. i break it down to as simple as 1+1. All they can see is that pep fought more. They doesn't factor in that 99% of the fighters back then doesn't have any formal training, no amatuer program, just slugging it out. These guys act like they are smart bc they pick a classic fighter.

 

Stats does mean ****. and if you are educated, then you would agree. Don't blame me if the net just toss some random crap of pep onto the net. Maybe those people toss those pep crap to tarnish his image. I should be wow by some running and duck and half of them still laned on him. atsch so guess what i have to base on? RECORDS. LIKE MY EXAMPLE THAT I HAVE MENTIONED ABOVE. You should know just by looking at the number that leunghungfist which is me, can't be f**k with on fight night 4. And if you are a betting man, you wouldn't bet on me to lose base on those stats. I am on a 67 winning streak against great players. STATS tell more than you think u simple minded fool.

 

Every boxing analyst considers floyd to be a better lightweight than pep FYI

and guess what.... floyd's stay at light weight was only a period of his career while pep is.... i don't need to say more. pac, shane, floyd, whitaker would all kick pep's ass.

 

compare to u mr. no talent and not good at anything guy. Ok