True the this fight is totally and absolutely irrelevant with an eventual Pac- Floyd fight. But still it's nice to remind it to the hard core Floyd fans
floyd having a relative "off" nite against castillo in their first match IMO doesnt mean squat in relation to fighting pacman, if anything i think that first castillo fight waz a REAL good learning experience for floyd and turned him into a even better fighter then he waz before IMO the reason he rematched castillo right away and soundly beat him waz because of 1 main reason only and that waz because floyd waz convinced that he fought a sub-par fight (for him, lol) and completely believed that he could whip castillo in a rematch now anyone using the word COWARD to decribe floyd is ridiculas HOWEVER i feel dispite that COWARD is completely the WRONG word to describe it the FACTz remain that floyd is very CONSERVATIVE in hiz CHOICEz of who and when he fightz whereby pacman is a complete animal when it comez to putting his MONEY where his mouth is and floyd completely SUCKz in this same area of course that has nothing whatsoever to do with the outcome of pacz n floydz possible rumble and only has to do with the FACTz of the matter IMO if i waz betting i would clearly put floyd as the favorite without question
Floyd fans forget about the first match that's why:hey I never said running was illegal but if your running you ain't fighting, if you are holding you ain't fighting, when you are spoiling you ain't fighting and as a fight fan I pay to see a fight, not to watch a guy steal rounds by outlanding rather than win them fighting. That shits for the Olympics. That's just the type of boxing fan I am.
not saying it is, but if in-fighting is the only way to beat floyd then expect to see the pac-roach team transform pac into the best in-fighter you can find. there in lies the answer as to why pac has a reasonable chance of beating floyd.