has to do with all of it. the reason why you idolize pbf is because you admire something in him. be it his skills, character or the lack thereof. why the hell should floyd not fight cotto. they are practically the same height. sure, cotto has a shorter reach but same weight. weightclasses are there for a reason. weight, height, reach. these are essential to weightclasses if you think about it. parity in 2 out of three is always the norm since you rarely find all fighters to be exact in all departments. pac-jmm-mab-em practically share the same features except morales who had a reach advantage. but pbf will have the weight, reach, height advantage over jmm or pac. :rofl:rofl:rofl i should applaud pbf for his great business decisions. :yikes i am beginning to see that the TS is right, PBF and pac are the same size. :rofl
Floyd can't carry Pac's spitbucket. Pac will be the greatest boxer in history by the time his career is over. Cotto too!
The same can be said for anyone who is the fan of a fighter. It's irrelevant. Cotto is shorter, lacks the reach, and Mayweather is 4-5 years older. . Weightclasses are essential but height is a factor in all weight classes. It happens in boxing. Again how will Floyd have weight advantage over Pac if they weigh exactly the same? FLoyd will have height and reach on both. Cotto and Pac are equal in size and reach but are you going to tell me the same size?
that's what you get of assuming, floyd assumed that he's a draw and a cash cow.. now look at the scheduled fight postponed because of poor ticket sales..
got to go and eat. i need to replenish my brain cells, which scatter often when talking to floydettes. i have to get this thought out of my brain. pbf+manny= equal size fighters. :hi::rofl
What are you talking about? You keep changing what natural weight means. Pac and Floyds natural FIGHT weight is 140. Both Floyd and Pacs natural weight is 147 where if they fought there they would cut maybe a lb or 2.