Floyd Mayweather and the round that changed everything

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Sep 8, 2010.


  1. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    Babality should stick to mortal kombat,not boxing . Heres fact. Same goes to Lance . 2 idiots discrediting ESB.
     
  2. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    What moron? Baldomir was the fight that made sense because:

    01. Baldomir EARNED his title.
    02. Baldomir was on a 19 fight winning streak.
    03. Baldomir was allegedly too much for FMJ.

    So in the stream of things Baldomir's win was good because that was the fight the fans wanted and FMJ got it done. Now can you PLEASE make a list of reasons why Margarito is a valid opponent?

    You, like most *******s, love to pull words out of context and disregard timelines as it suits you.
     
  3. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Well, you made the weakie point earlier about me being the only person wanting the fight ("A fan..."). Take a look at what the media was saying. Review the video.
     
  4. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,284
    15,110
    Dec 6, 2008
    Of course, cause he beat Judah and was the champ. You were going on about how people were saying he was gonna give Floyd a tougher fight than everyone expected. Oh please. He deserved it only because he was the champ, he was no threat.

    Defend his win vs Mosley, people really did turn around after that one. Or his win vs DLH, or another one. But Baldo? Oh please. It's ridiculous.
     
  5. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch I never said NO ONE asked for the fight moron. ****...do ANY of you Floyd fanatics have proper reading comprehension?

    Marnoff said MANY...he provided three...:lol::lol:
     
  6. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Cute, but as usual you don't poses the ability to have a boxing discussion.

    The "carbon copy" statement was in response to people like you who have the irrational belief that somehow Mayweather was OK fighting Baldomir, but scared to fight Margarito. It is ignorant.
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    Wow...you took that literally you ****in moron? :patsch
     
  8. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama Guest

    Of course....that I'm sure played a roll in his decision. But Floyd absolutely ducked PAC MAN. There are NO other options that are on par with a PAC/Mayweather fight.
     
  9. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Sure, keep sitting on the fence.
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Even as World Champ, Baldomir was barely a top 10 WW. :deal
     
  11. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    1. People wanted the fight and they got it.

    2. It happens with every Floyd fight. Everyone's "the real challenge" until they lose. Name a Floyd opponent and it's the same story with a few minor details changed.
     
  12. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    WTF are you on about now. :huhWe've already established a few wanted this fight. You didn't provide ANYTHING new... So what am I on the fence on?:patsch
     
  13. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Who in the hell else are on the level of Dan Rafael and Brian Kenny?!? They are THE PREMIERE boxing journalist and commentator today!

    That would be like saying "world leaders and he gave four" then listing the President of the US, the Prime Minister of England, the President of Russia, and the Premier of China. Then you replying, well that is just four. :lol:
     
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Oh, let me guess. You were using sarcasm to hide the fact that you don't know what you're talking about. Again.
     
  15. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Exactly. The credibility/quality of the source most definitely counts for something. It's like Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal making a point about tennis and people saying that it's only two people - to add another example since he doesn't seem to get it.