Floyd Mayweather fans!

Larry is a *****.

 

Top 100 ATG maybe, certainly nowhere near top 50. It's his own fault for valuing that '0' so much. Floyd's resume raises more questions about who and when he didn't fight rather than who he did, then he has the nerve to besmirch the name of the only other other great fighter in and around his own weight class that he could have fought but chose not to (repeatedly). I would have bet my house on him beating Pac at any point in the past 3-4 years but he never dared to try. Instead he wants the riches and the shortcut to greatness without taking any risks.

 

You're a smart young man... Void is a good boxer but a bad man! :good

 

You dont have to like him as a person but if you respct him as being a great fighter and you learn some aspects of boxing from him that makes you a better fighter then its all good. Just keep watching and learning.

 

It really wasn't called for! :-( I don't know about you but I respect my elders!

 

Name me 50 fighters greater than Floyd

#HappyBirthday

 

LOL Why do you EVEN bother......you know full well they can't.

 

Floyd brings on a lot of hate himself, but with Larry it seems personal.

I remember that fight, remember Angel complaining about the stoppage but I didn't remember Larry's comment... The excuse for Larry is he likes action fighters and that's why he's not keen on Floyd, but back then Floyd was an action fighter and that comment was completely unnecessary.

 

Ouch....

I normally like Merchant, but that was uncalled for. Floyd was being polite and said nothing wrong. It would be kinda amusing if Larry said the same thing now, because Floyd often behaves like an idiot to other fighters, but at that time he just looked like a decent kid who was happy with his victory. Bad form, Merchant.

 

42-0 and the last 7 opponents have all been ranked top 3 in his division or top 10 in the world.:deal

Those saying he ducks the best competition are ignorant. His last 7 opponents have been world class opposition.

 

50 fighters greater than Floyd or 50 fighters with greater resumes than Floyd? The latter would be considerably easier than you think, and the former is just speculation either way. Floyd never shared a ring with a prime or near-prime ATG so we'll never know just how great he is/was. He had the chance to meet and defeat some good-to-great names to bolster his legacy but he always found reasons not to. Once again, his own fault.

 

Robinson
Armstrong
Greb
Ali
Charles
Duran
Pep
Louis
Leonard
Moore
Langford
Monzon
Leonard
Gans
Wilde
Jofre
Tunney
Hagler
Marciano
Walker
Pacquiao
Jack Johnson
Dempsey
Gavilan
Ross
Williams
Whitaker
Canzoneri
Saddler
Chavez Sr.
Fitzsimmons
Spinks
Ketchel
Conn
Burley
Napoles
Griffith
Foster
Holmes
Arguello
Walcott
Sanchez
Foreman
Frazier
Hearns
McLarnin
LaMotta
Olivares
McGovern
Hopkins
Jones Jr.
Holyfield

 

I'm having audio issues it appears. What did merchant say in that vid?

 

17 of these fighters are arguable. Try 50 fighters without any argument. I can just as easily post a list and say they are greater. Pacquiao is an example of a fighter who is not a given on this list and so is McGovern and Holmes.

He can't because there are not 50 fighters out there (without argument) that aren't greater all time.

You can't name 10 based on SKILL alone. Probably not even 5.