Floyd Mayweather "If I take Another Long Layoff I May Not Come Back."

That means another tune-up?

If you go on vacation, definitely you need to remove the rust with a tune-up..


That was what I have been saying before........vacation.........tune-up...........vacation........tune-up........vacation.........tune-up (while the *****s would be labelling those tune-ups as Hungry Young Lions).

 

void is void.

 

Marquez, Mosley, and Ortiz were all tuneups?

 

Floyd: Take the test!!

Sergio: OK

Floyd: Not you.

 

u miss the news? :hey

 

What?? No. link

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=10837962#post10837962

 

You're desperately holding on to a rumor.

 

we'll see. I didn't believe it, but I'm hearing it from too many ppl

 

JMM at 144 (I mean 146 after he failed to make weight) - Yes

Mosley - Old, past his prime - yes

Ortiz - WTF? Maidana made Ortiz his *****. Winning against Berto suddenly makes him a hungry, young lion? - yes

So the answer is yes.

 

They believe what they want to believe and discard what does not fall in their own agenda.


Email from Tim Smith =====Believe 100 per cent

It is crazy to fight Pac after Ortiz ------ does not fall in the agenda ----does not know boxing

I will fight the winner of martinez -Williams -----falls in the agenda -------Believe


7 days is not good enough according to Mayweather --------falls in tthe agenda -----believe and defend that OSDT should have no cut-off

Ortiz is a hungry young lion ----- check the agenda and then believe

JMM fight is not a catchweight -------check the agenda and believe (only Pac does catchweights)

 

Floyd Mayweather "If I take Another Long Layoff I May Not Come Back."

Pac KO Marquez.
- Floyd "May not come back"

Pac close UD/SD or DRAW Marquez.
- Floyd "Another Long Layoff"

:good

 

SLOPPY A$$ ARGUMENT TOO.

*******S

1. Ignore Facts

2. Downgrade valid info

3. Pay 0 attention to any argument negative to their own

4. DO NOT address facts shown to them, in rebuttal to their own posts.

5. Insult the poster, rather than focus on the argument at hand; by doing this, you lose the argument easy as you don't even address the argument the opposite poster is putting up.

6. Come up with off the wall $hit, with nothing to back it, just to make yourself look like you said something valid; many times this off the wall $hit has nothing to do with boxing.

YOUR CONSISTENTLY GUILTY OF

NUMBER 1
NUMBER 2
NUMBER 3
NUMBER 4

AND ESPECIALLY

NUMBER 5
NUMBER 6..

Bro you dont see it...YOU KEEP TOUCHIN UP ON THIS 14 DAY CUTOFF..

LOOK AT ALL THE FACTS:deal

FLOYD HAD TO COME TO A MIDDLE GROUND...WHILE YOUR BOY PAC WENT DOWN 6 DAYS CUZ OF A VIDEO SHOWN....FLOYD CAME UP 14 DAYS...:deal

TAKE THE TESTS..FIGHT COULDA BEEN HAPPENED.hi:

REMATCH COULD HAVE BEEN HAPPENED TO..YEA JUST TAKE THE TESTSbbb:hi:

 

JMM "BEATIN ON PAC AND TAKIN THE BIG FIGHT AWAY"

:hi::good

FUKIN *******S LIKE THIS FUKIN DUMMY DON'T KNOW LOGIC..

YOUR BOI STILL GOT A VERY HARD FIGHT AND YOU CHOOSE TO IGNORE THAT..

SHOWS HOW WEAK YOUR ARGUMENT REALLY IShat