Floyd Mayweather "If I take Another Long Layoff I May Not Come Back."

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PetethePrince, Sep 28, 2011.


  1. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Why do you keep on posting this/


    Is your argument solely based on this garbage?

    Let me see :

    SDSFinest agreed to the following :

    This content is protected
    (I could find a thread where your sore ass agreed to those cut-off dates).

    Gayweather suddenly changed his mind and decided it was not good enough.

    SDSFinest change his tune to say that 14 days is not good enough anymore.

    let's move the goalpost, shall we?

    This content is protected







    SDS change his tune faster than a prison snitch to mirror that of his master. Suddenly 14 days is not good anymore. He trumpeted that same lousy argument that since his master, who actually never even read anything about PEDS change his tune, he should too.

    But lo and behold, why not move the goalpost again.

    This content is protected
    .


    lo and behold, the *****s headed by sds moved their goalpost too. No cut-off or 'take the tests".

    It is understandable why fighters move their goalpost. It is sometimes ego thing, one upmanship, or most of the time simply becing scared. But as a fan, would you mirror your decisions based on how your BF move theirs?

    It is not about whether Pac agreed or not, or whether Gayweather's ever moving goalpost is valid. It is a question of whether as a fan, when would you say "enough is enough!" Instead of relentlessly defending an ever moving goalpost. You look idiotic actually because by principle, you agreed at that point in time that the 3 time frames were adequate only to retract it when your BF moved his!

    Once agains, it is not an issue whether Pac agreed or not, because Pac is entitled to his own decisions and opinions, just as *****s are entitled to Floyd's decisions!
     
  2. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Pac,Khan,Pac his last 3 fights!
     
  3. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    BOUTA OWN THIS STUPID DUMMY

    IN REBUTTAL

    NICE OPINION..SHANE WAS #3 IN THE WORLD AND #2 AT WW..HE WAS COMING OFF A WIN OVER ANTONIO MARGARITO WHO, AT THE TIME, WAS CONSIDERED THE BEST (CONSENSU)..MANY *******S LIKE YOURSELF SAID FLOYD WOULD NOT FIGHT HIM AFTER THE JMM FIGHT..

    OWNED YA THERE..

    ORTIZ-#3 WW...TOP RANKED FIGHTER...SHAME THE #1 GUY JUST WONT TAKE THE TESTS WHEN THIS FIGHT WAS MADE..:huh

    OWNED EM AGAIN..:deal:hi:

    To Manny-

    SHANE MOSLEY-NOT EVEN A TOP 10 IN THE WORLD WHEN PAC FIGHTS HIM:deal:rofl COMING OFF A DRAW TO MORA

    ANTONIO MARGARITO-BUM...KNOWS VERY LITTLE ABOUT THE BASICS OF BOXING SUCH AS "NOT CROSSING YOUR FEET" OR "SLIPPING A PUNCH" OR "CATCH AND TOUCH"..HE WAS ALSO UNRANKED IN THE WORLD AT THE TIME PAC FOUGHT HIM...ALSO NOT RANKED AT 154.. THE GUY WHO LOST TO THE OLD SHANE YOUR TALKING ABOUT:deal:hi:

    CLOTTEY-COMING OFF A LOSS TO MIGUEL COTTO-CLOSE BUT CLEAR-

    COTTO-I HAVE TO SHUT MY MOUTH HERE. 8 IN THE WORLD 2 RANKED WW-UNLIKE YOURSELF I GIVE CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE LIL HO:bbb-NO BIAS DUMMY..JUST A STRAIGHT BOXING FAN HERE.

    HATTON-LMFAO...WAS ROCKED AGAINST LAZCANO....RANKED 9 IN THE WORLD SO CANT ARGUE THERE...GREAT LACK OF CONFIDENCE LOSS AFTER THE FLOYD FIGHT-SEE LAZCANO-HATTON ROUND 10..HATTON SAVED BY REF!

    OSCAR DE LA HOYA-UNRANKED AT WW AND HADN'T MADE THE WEIGHT IN 8 YEARS OR MORE..UNRANKED IN THE WORLD

    FACT-PAC HAS NOT FOUGHT A GUY COMING OFF A WIN IN ALMOST 2 YEARS...

    SCHOOL'S OUT-BELL JUST RUNG FOR YA:hi::deal
     
  4. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    3,612
    3
    Nov 30, 2008
    you mad *****? :lol:

    Vacation? :rofl
     
  5. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    WOW..HOW MANY TIMES YA FUKIN DUMMY-IN A MEDIATION YOU HAVE TO COME TO A MIDDLE GROUND...FLOYD'S MIDDLE GROUND WAS 14 DAYS....

    "BOTH PARTIES TRIED TO MAKE THE FIGHT IN GOOD FAITH"

    MEDIATOR

    OWNED EM AGAIN..

    STOP TRYING.

    14 DAY ARGUMENT NOT HOLDING UP MAN..THAT WAS DONE FOR THE MEDIATION WHERE YOU HAVE TO COME TO MIDDLE TERMS (SUPPPOSED TO).

    NICE TRY...BUT AGAIN....THAT OFFER WAS SAID TO BE GOOD AT THAT TIME ONLY AND RIGHTFULLY SO.

    IN A POST MARK MCGUIRE ERA YOU NEED TO TAKE THE TESTS.....CARE WHAT SPORT OR WHO FIGHTING.....

    ATHLETES COMPETING IN SANCTIONED VIOLENCE HAVE EVERY RIGHT...

    TWIST THAT HOW U WANT...BUT ITS THE TRUTH.

    TRY AGAIN..SHOT YOUR FUKIN ARGUMENT DOWN WITH THAT "14 DAY AND YOUR A ***** IF YOU DIDN'T STOP THEIR":deal

    NOBODY SAYING I DIDN'T AGREE...BUT YOUR CONSISTENTLY TELLING ONE SIDE OF A STORY AND NOT THE FULL PART DUMMY.

    TRY AGAIN BUDDY
     
  6. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007

    *******S

    1. Ignore Facts

    2. Downgrade valid info

    3. Pay 0 attention to any argument negative to their own

    4. DO NOT address facts shown to them, in rebuttal to their own posts.

    5. Insult the poster, rather than focus on the argument at hand; by doing this, you lose the argument easy as you don't even address the argument the opposite poster is putting up.

    6. Come up with off the wall $hit, with nothing to back it, just to make yourself look like you said something valid; many times this off the wall $hit has nothing to do with boxing.

    YOUR GUILTY OF

    NUMBER 3

    AND

    NUMBER 5.




    PLUS, WHAT THE FUK IS THERE TO BE MAD ABOUT?:rofl:rofl:rofl
    THIS...

    GUY WITH LONG REACH, GOOD COUNTERPUNCHING SKILLS, N A RIDICULOUS RING IQ GOT NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT..STRAIGHT UP...

    RUNNING IN LIKE THAT..."SCARED" LMFAO:nut

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtARRrX2FXQ[/ame]
     
  7. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  8. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Try again buddy!!!

    The issue was never about Gayweather's goalposts!!!!He is entitled to move his because he is the one fighting.

    The issue is how the *****s mirror their goalpost to that of Gayweather. Everytime Gayweather puts out his timeframe, isn't it that you defend those timelines? By logic, those timeframes are as valid as they are the moment your sorry ass defended those.


    Can't think? Why don't you just echo Gayweather?

    Was there any point in time when you ever think, 'wait a minute, I already said 7 days or no fight"?
     
  9. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    3,612
    3
    Nov 30, 2008
    :lol:
     
  10. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    If Pac does not KO JMM at 144, it is an utter failure.

    Just as if Gayweather does not KO JMM at 146, it is an utter failure. I already stated that when the fight was announced. The result was as obvious as can be. Only an idiot buys the **** that Gayweather schooled him, therefore it was a success.

    When you bring your opponent to deep water and he does not know how to swim in the deep water, if you can not drown him, it is an utter failure.

    So --- If Pac does not KO JMM at 144, it is a failure....... I repeat......a failure.


    Don't worry, Pac won't get any ounce of credit for this fight from me. I just want to see how to drown a fighter in deep waters.
     
  11. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    OK LETS GET ON THIS REAL QUICK..

    My argument is based on Floyds idea, yes! BUT I'VE TOLD EVERY FUKIN ******* ON HERE THAT I BELIEVE IN THE IDEA!

    IF FLOYD CHANGED HIS STANCE TOMORROW, AND SAID "I'M NOT TAKIN THE TESTS,"

    AND

    PAC SAID "IM NOW DEMANDING THE RANDOM DRUG TESTS"

    I WOULD AGREE WITH MANNY, NOT FLOYD...AGAIN, I AGREE WITH THE FUKIN IDEA.............SURE, FLOYD CAME UP WITH IT (FOR WHATEVER REASON YOU OR I BELIEVE IS NOT IMPORTANT AS IT DOESN'T MATTER TO MY FINAL POINT) BUT I JUST BELIEVE IN IT..

    NO FIGHTER...ACTUALLY, NO ATHLETE, IN ANY SPORT, IN A POST MARK MCGUIRE ERA SHOULD NOT BE WILLING TO TAKE A URINE OR BLOOD TEST TO TEST FOR BANNED SUBSTANCES WHICH INCREASE ANY TYPE OF PHYSICAL GAIN.

    YOU CAN TWIST THAT, TURN IT, TELL ME ITS A ***** STATEMENT..IN THE END ITS A FAIR AND VALID STATEMENT..

    BUT IM NOT ARGUING THAT FAR!:deal I'm arguing that "no athlete in a sanctioned violence sport, should be willing to not take a drug test, period.

    You keep complaining about your cutoff...YOU MISS THAT IT KILLS THE ENTIRE POINT OF THE TESTS....CUTS OFF THE INTEGRITY..THAT IS NOT DEBATABLE....IT WILL DO THAT. DONT TELL ME "O WELL PAC WOULDNT DO THAT" CUZ YOU NOW ARE SO DESPERATE THAT YOUR TRYING TO SAY "FLOYD TAKIN EM" (IF NOT YOU MANY *******S N HATERS ON HERE ARE)...CMON NOW...THATS FUKIN REACHING RIGHT THERE IF YOU WANNA LOOK AT EVERYTHING SINCE ABOUT DECEMBER, 2008.

    So in rebuttal, I don't care if Floyd changes his fukin stance, I still think it should be a 0 day FOR BOTH FIGHTERS, END OF DISCUSSION...

    HOWEVER, I UNDERSTAND (UNLIKE MOST *******S) THAT CIRCUMSTANCES CALL FOR DIFFERENT ACTIONS....

    EDIT: THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, IN THIS CASE CALL FOR A VERY HIGH PROFILE FIGHT....PAC HAS 0 EXCUSE NOT TO TAKE THEM...HE IS NOT SCARED OF NEEDLES RIGHT? HE WILL HAVE THE NECESSARY TIME TO TRAIN (ROACH SAID IN DEC 09, THAT A MARCH 13 2010 DATE WOULD NOT GIVE PAC ENOUGH TIME TO PREPARE), AND HE CAN HAVE HIS LITTLE 10 MILLION A LB OVER LIKE FLOYD IMMIDEATELY AGREED TO...

    EDIT: THE FACT THAT TEAM PAC PUT IT OUT THERE, TO THE MEDIA, THAT THEY AGREED...AND I BELIEVE THEY DID....THEY SHOULD HAVE KEPT THAT STANCE FROM A PROFESSIONAL STANDPOINT, NO MATTER IF THEY FOUN OUT THEY COULD NOT HAVE A CUTOFF-PERIOD.

    ALSO, THERE IS NO DENYING THE VIDEO OF ROACH ON DEC 13 CLAIMING THEY AGREE TO THE TESTS..

    DON'T REBUTTAL WITH "ROACH ISN'T EVERYTHING" OR WHATEVER THE FUK...

    ROACH REPRESENTS TEAM PACQUIAO AND WHAT HE SAYS CAN REPRESENT "TEAM PAC'S SIDE":deal

    Also, why do you not EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY AGREED?

    SO HARD TO DEBATE WITH *******S LIKE THIS :bart
     
  12. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    Also, i have touched up on you ******* a$$e$ rebuttals about 10x more than you have ever even touched my points..

    You usually respond with "fuk you *****" thus my point above is proven..
     
  13. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007

    Hey he didnt ko Mosley and that was a failure too then:deal

    Didn't KO THE GUY WHO MOSLEY KO'D IN TONY, SO THERES ANOTHER FAILURE...

    RAN A SCHOOLING ON CLOTTEY...LETS NOT FORGET EVERYTIME CLOTTEY TOUCHED MANNY (VERY FEW TIMES) HE HURT HIM....STILL...PAC LOOKED TECHNICALLY FLAWED AS HE DID WITH SHANE MOSLEY..

    GOTTA GIVE CREDIT WITH THE COTTO FIGHT..SOMETHING *******S NEVER DO..

    BEAUTIFUL FUKIN WIN FOR PACQUIAO....EARNED THE RIGHT TO BE #1 IN THE WORLD..

    SINCE THEN.....VERY WEAK OPPOSITION...#5 WW IN CLOTTEY WAS OK....

    TONY WAS A HORRIBLE CHOICE IN TERMS OF "ACTUAL COMPETITION"

    SHANE WAS RANKED #13 IN THE WORLD WHEN PAC FOUGHT HIM:deal
    3 IN THE WORLD WHEN FLOYD FOUGHT HIM..

    AGAIN....I GIVE PROPS WHERE THEY ARE DUE..
     
  14. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    *******S

    1. Ignore Facts

    2. Downgrade valid info

    3. Pay 0 attention to any argument negative to their own

    4. DO NOT address facts shown to them, in rebuttal to their own posts.

    5. Insult the poster, rather than focus on the argument at hand; by doing this, you lose the argument easy as you don't even address the argument the opposite poster is putting up.

    6. Come up with off the wall $hit, with nothing to back it, just to make yourself look like you said something valid; many times this off the wall $hit has nothing to do with boxing.

    YOUR GUILTY OF ALL OF THEM.............FOR THE 4TH OR 5TH TIME NOW:huh..SOME **** LIKE THAT..

    YEA YOU CANT FUK WITH THE ARGUMENT..

    NICE REBUTTAL..IM STILL GOIN TO WORK TOMORROW CLOWN:hi:HERE TO TALK BOXING..

    IF YOU CANT PROVE MY $HIT WRONG WITH YOUR OWN FACTS STFU!:deal:hat:nut
     
  15. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    To thread topic...fuk that..floyd needa stay n fight....i dont see any reason why he cant fight 1.5 times a year or some ****...do 3 in a year and 1 in another..

    I know he got that self preservation, and he gotta think about himself....etc etc..

    Just for the last few years...floyd should give us the 'quantity" of fights..

    Wont happen but it would be good for the sport n the fans.