Floyd Mayweather Jr(24yrs) vs Amir Khan(present age 24yrs) who has the best resume

I'll tell him

 

This content is protected

 

i guess i forgot the time that floyd got flattened by a journeyman in one round.

 

Not only that. I'll throw a football over them mountains, too. :good

 

Good night, brudda. And sorry if I came across as a dickhead. You're a passionate fan, and I respect that.

 

he's trying to invalidate the list by crying about the number of Americans.

you know American's and Brits are equal in boxing, even though the State of Michigan on its own has produced more world champions than more than a few European countries. atsch

 

Thread should have ended right here.

 

Mayweather

I like how you list three guys for Mayweather but list five guys for Khan. Do you really believe Barrera, Kotelnik, and Paulie are better wins than Manfredy?

Obvious bias...

 

What an idiot this Darni187 is! He reminds me of that kid in class that never seems to get it and just frustrates the f**k out of everyone else.

 

I applaud Darni for being a loyal fan.

BUT you have no undeerstanding of boxing history. WHEN its all said an ddone Khan will be a good fighter. NOTHING exceptional. Mayweahter JR will be an ATG. stop being a fan boy and open your eyes .

 

then what is the point of this thread?

atsch

admit it, you got owned on your own thread and have since backed up your stance and contradicted what your entire thread was based on several times over. Now you're clinging to the possibility that Khan may be better then Floyd when it's all said and done, which is absolutely nothing at all what this thread was made about. Grow up, own up, and watch some more boxing.

 

It's pretty obvious to see the people who have been dealing with facts, and not opinions/what if's.

The one thing you should never do on a boxing forum is talk about/criticise a boxers resume when you know very little about said resume. The reason for this is because 99.9% of the time, someone always knows more about said subject.

Fair enough, the threadstarter made a comparison between the two resumes (which is far from the worst thing I have seen on this forum)...but then admits he knows very little about Mayweather's early career. His defense should have ended here, afterall that is essentially what the thread is about.

What tends to happen when you get someone talking about a boxer they know very little about is, they come unstuck. They are asked questions they cannot answer, they are provided with facts that they didn't know, they are basically given a lesson about said boxer. They shouldn't change the subject each and every time they can't answer a question, and they shouldn't then criticise said boxers recent resume.

 

i think khan has the better resume

may hadnt fought anyone as tough as maidana through 24