I'd find it easier to reply to your post if you learned what a paragraph is. Also ease up on the question marks dude, they are giving everyone a headache. Have you thought about using Grammarly before you post? Once you have learned how to string a sentence together please repost and I will respond. PS look up what "devil's advocate" means.
Excellent post as always mate, I always learn a lot. @surfinghb This is what an intelligent response looks like, learn from it.
oh great . Now we are on the same page then .. when Floyd actually takes the fight against Tommy at 147, then post .. Learn the sport first , then come back, See you in 40 years . the time I have put in the sport .... Go back to General .. see you in 40 years. good luck Rookie
I don't think Mayweather beats prime Leonard, I am just quoting what other Mayweather fans have said before on this forum.
If a post on a forum makes you this angry how do you deal with all the other difficulties you must face, like not knowing how to read and write? Have you considered Prozac? Having mental health issues is nothing to be ashamed of, just let it all out, this is a safe space.
Does no one on this f*cking thread know what "devil's advocate" means?? There are some hysterical ding dongs on here
then maybe you 2 should dim the lights, get out the lubricante, light some candles .. and grease up to Floyd beating Hearns .. Because if you actually followed Floyd's career .. then you would know .. he doesn't take the fight it being 12 -17 pounds over his best weight against prime Tommy hearns .. Floyd never fought another ATG in his Prime .. and he aint going to start that with the motor city cobra ... so actually maybe you should learn from it ? ya think ?
Floyd largely fought the best available. If he's missing prime ATGs it's not due to ducking rather them not being available. This argument just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Fighting Cotto, Corrales, Marquez, Alvarez, etc isn't cherrypicking. When he moved up he took on and beat the reigning champions. Where is all this cherrypicking? He also immediately rematched guys who gave him tough fights. He's criticized for not fighting Pacquiao earlier and maybe he could have faced Paul Williams but beyond that I don't see the merit in the criticism of his opponents. Nobody else stood out.
The 2 of us should grease up to Floyd beating Hearns? I think you're getting yourself confused, I specified in my post that I'd give Floyd no chance vs Hearns. I just didn't respond to Blofeld like a p***k in making my arguments.