Floyd Mayweather vs. a 28-year old Jermain Taylor

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KOTF, Jan 29, 2012.


  1. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
  2. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    Sounds like a fight that would need offering of free room, free buffet, and free limo ride to sell it's ticket :lol:.

    To answer your question....nobody beat Floyd in a fantasy fight. In reality, Floyd would never get in a ring with someone that dangerous.
     
  3. unsentdemon

    unsentdemon Active Member Full Member

    1,422
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that would be the most boringest fight ever!!!!!!! I rather see cory spinks vs Malignaggie
     
  4. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    Taylor is way bigger so I think he wins.
     
  5. CHAL_DIESEL

    CHAL_DIESEL GOAT Full Member

    2,385
    1
    Mar 18, 2011
    Taylor based off of size
     
  6. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    This is the same Jermain Taylor who had all he could handle in Cory Spinks.
    If this was about a 26 or 27 year old Taylor. I think I'd go with Taylor. For a very breef molment in time he was really really good. We have also never seen Floyd Mayweather at middleweight.
    I can see Taylor biulding up a solid lead and fading late. While Mayweather has underrated power at 147. I don't see him having good power at 160.
    The questions to ask are: How much of a lead will Taylor have before fading? Will Mayweather be able to steel any of the early rounds.
    I think it would come down to a split decision that can go either way.
     
  7. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    I remember thinking when i watched the Taylor Spinks fight that Mayweather should have gone up to Middleweight and taken them belts. Taylors ring IQ was not great...