Floyd Mayweather vs. Amir Khan speculation & discussion

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Aug 14, 2011.


  1. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

    :patschabsolute bollocks what u have wrote, to pick canelo over lara after how lara schooled and dominated trout who really did beat canelo, and how canelo was outboxed against mayweather shows ur ignorance, LAra will outbox flat footed canelo just like mayweather did, and to say maidana has more experience that Lara is absolutely shocking, lara has a great am background which is more important than pro experience, also how is an evenly matched fight boring, lara mayweather would not be boring and floyd makes most fights boring anyway even against exciting fighters like canelo,

    molina did not beat lara despite what u think he uses illegal tactics, clicnhing, and if you watch for who landed the cleaner shots it was lara, in a rematch molina will barely land a punch

    paragraphs and paragraphs of absolute BS u wrote!
     
  2. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012
    Now you're just rambling. He's the best current active fighter, that's for sure. Furthermore, a high ranking in the sport does not mean that you have to make nonsensical decisions. Absolutely no one, including you, would fight Lara over Maidana or Khan if they were in Mayweather's position. Mayweather vs. Lara could potentially bomb at the box office, and has the makings of a very tactical and boring fight. Where is the upside? It's a fight that could upset the network, the fans, and it would do little for Mayweather were he to win.
     
  3. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    I know Mayweather will probably win 12-0 11-1 but thats a credit to him. I'll be watching no matter who he fights because his days are numbered.
     
  4. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

    U guys are the worst fans absolutely brainwashed, mayweather is neither the most talented or the best, but hes the most famous, how would mayweather do against the best fighters in each country in an am world championship or against a cuban Olympic champion, the best boxer in the world is rigondeaux absolute fact its undisputable, more talented and technical than mayweather has fought everyone and achieved everything,

    Mayweather has a carefully managed career but is not the best and if he fought lara everyone would see!
     
  5. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    Mayweather only goes to 154 for big fights, Lara isnt big. if lara was a WW maybe but at 154 nope.

    Plus if he was to beat him people would say ""He went life and death with Angulo, how was he gonna beat Mayweather" the hate ever ends
     
  6. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    Nobody has better reflexes, nobody has better defense, nobody is more accurate or has a better + - then Mayweather, so stop. hes the best boxr hands down. Gonna tell me somebody with 13 fights is better then Mayweather :patsch:patsch
     
  7. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

     
  8. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

    :lol: more brainwsahed trolls mayweather is not the best nowere near the talent level of rigondeaux or a guy like kindelan, its not an opinion its a fact, rigondeaux has better footowrk better punches better defence he throws every shot with his shoulder and bodyweight unlike mayweather hes achieved what mayweather could never do as an am or as a pro in under 13 fights has a better win over donaire better than anywin on mayweathers record who picks and chooses past prime boxers and handpicks! stop with ur BS
     
  9. Lady Girl

    Lady Girl Kneel Before Zod! Full Member

    31,836
    2,058
    Nov 2, 2013
    wow, rigondeaux. that would be a hell of a match up. the only problem is, floyd wont take it :deal:lol:
     
  10. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

    **** thers plenty of amateurs who are more talented than mayweather, for example julio cesar la cruz two time world am champion and iglesias
     
  11. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    he doesnt have better defense, Mayweather is top 5 all time in that category. and he's only had 13 fights to prove it against with only 1 good fighter on there dummy :nut:nut:nut. just with that remark i realized u dont know what your talking about so this convo is over. :hi:
     
  12. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

    ok then mayweathers the best boxer, even though hes not the most talented or hasn't fought the best boxers right LOL :lol:
     
  13. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    who gives a damn about amateurs...THERE AMATEURS!!! Thats like saying Winston is better then Peyton Manning, hes not a pro yet so stop!

    U do realize u sound like a complete moron right. How can anybody take u serious?? your talking about the best fighter of this Era. and at 37 is still in top form
     
  14. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

    Rigondeaux is a better than mayweather in every area, its not an opinion if you know boxing hes just technically better and more talented also could mayweather win two gold medals two am world championships, no its a fact he couldn't he lost at national level several times against low opposition like sanchez and got a gift over aaragon in the Olympics and then was put out, also who has mayweather fought? hand picked opponents
     
  15. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    hasnt fought the best boxers about Rigo and Lara have?? HAHAHAHA

    I;ll ask u one last question and think hard before u post your dumb answer.

    Would Mayweather go life or death against Angulo??