Floyd Mayweather vs prime Oscar De La Hoya.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Young Terror, Aug 31, 2012.


  1. hookfromhell

    hookfromhell Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,861
    48
    May 5, 2011
    Oscar 117 to 112. Oscar's jab befuddles Maywather,
    the left hook drops Money at 140.
     
  2. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,571
    3,763
    May 4, 2012
    Assuming its at 140 Oscar by decision.
     
  3. it's bladerunner
     
  4. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    140 Floyd. 147 50/50
     
  5. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    theres no such thing as a prime oscar, he would have said **** the jab or got it taken away after 5 rds. plus he would have faded as well, oscar did all those things in his fights with trinidad and mosley. younger odh would suffer the same fate maybe even worse with lesser experience.
     
  6. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    People love adding the word prime to a fighter = wrecks and kayos floyd. Why don't they talk about a prime Floyd who was virtually untouchable in lower weight classes? Floyd at 130-140 is miles ahead of "money".
     
  7. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
  8. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    fug this would be easy. oscar all day. their fight was not even a dominant win for the chicken shite
     
  9. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    De La Hoya takes it. Mayweather didn't have an easy time with an old De La Hoya. No way in hell Mayweather's work rate would be high enough to beat a young De La Hoya. He would be shoulder rolling all night, and not throwing much in return. Like the first four rounds of the Judah fight.
     
  10. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    Clear UD for Oscar.
     
  11. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    Dumb-in-a-can
     
  12. randy brown

    randy brown $$$ Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Oct 28, 2011
    at 154 it shuda been ud for floyd so i can't see how oscar wins over floyd at 147.
     
  13. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007

    If you think winning 8-4 rounds at a new weight of 154, tiny ring, big gloves in every way oscar tried to stack the card against Floyd as "having a hard time" you are truely stupid. Floyd didn't even use his legs and he still beat Oscar. That ring was a farce take two steps and your back is on the ropes.

    Oscar was 33, he is out of prime but he is not "old". Floyd fought Cotto, Ortiz who was much younger and still won. AT THEIR WEIGHT WITH NO CARD STACKING. Deserves credit? of course not. Dumbasses, i swear.
     
  14. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    Oscar takes this no doubt.

    Some of you only seem to remember DLH the part-time boxer.

    Oscar's resume @ 147 and below shits all over FLoyds.
     
  15. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    As if Oscar couldn't jab or hook at 33. Where was Floyd's pity when he struggled at times of recent when he was 33, 34, 35?????