Floyd Mayweather vs Thomas Hearns - 147

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by xnico, Jun 26, 2021.


Who wins

  1. Mayweather KO

    6 vote(s)
    8.8%
  2. Mayweather Decision

    4 vote(s)
    5.9%
  3. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Hearns KO

    38 vote(s)
    55.9%
  5. Hearns Decision

    20 vote(s)
    29.4%
  1. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,014
    18,945
    Jul 25, 2015
    For this fight, Floyd Mayweather would take a three year training camp, pumping himself with countless foreign chemicals of questionable legality and scoffing at least 6 boars testicles a day, with two prayers to Ares, the patron god of TMT, a day finishing off his training sessions (with an extra prayer to Poseidon to stop himself drowning in fear during the night). Entering the ring, kissing his lucky fortune amulet and then beginning the bout at the sound of the gong, Money May goes to work. Performing his best, highly practised impression of Roberto Duran, Mickey Walker, Iran Barkley and Mike Tyson all rolled into one, the May man whizs out of his corner bobbing and weaving 100 times per second. Of course, the pitiful, humanly limited Thomas Hearns cannot discern these movements whilst Mayweather prepares his attack, and stands there dumbfounded. The sheer rotation and gravitational force Money Maymay produces allow his hooks to generate enough power to actually, possibly, score a knockout punch of 147lbs calibre. 4 seconds into the bout and Hearns is getting destroyed, friction marks searing into his body from taking 100 moneymakers and shoulderrollders within 0.5 seconds. However, due to the force of his attack, Money has quite literally begun to char and melt, his big, bald bonce being the first to suffer this devastating horror. His hands suffer next, and only smouldering stumps of glove are left to attack. 10 seconds into the bout, and Money has almost entirely disintegrated to reveal a gleaming golden skeleton with the inscription 'trademark Leonard Ellerbe, kiss kiss' seared within. Of course, Money cannot attack anymore. 12 seconds in, Hearns musters the entirety of his strength to land one right handed misslie on the gleaming monument of misfortune. Apparently, Emanuel Steward could be heard repeating 'Oh my God!' hundreds of times for hours after this event, next to Jim Lampley crying mournfully whilst Larry Merchant laughs hysterically. All in all, a good PPV for $666.66, but ESB still complained about the undercard.

    Hearns KO1, 12 seconds.
     
    Loudon and surfinghb like this.
  2. scandcb

    scandcb Active Member Full Member

    1,029
    1,209
    Jun 9, 2020
    You are either trolling or very dumb.

    I never said that Hearns was unbeatable at that weight. Leonard showed that he wasn't.

    I never said that Mayweather was easy to hit in general. Just that Hearns would not have found it too difficult because of the style match-up.

    You are a fanboy.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  3. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,841
    8,449
    Aug 15, 2018
    To be fair I did say he would start out defensively and as Hearns tired in the later rounds which he did Mayweather would switch to a more aggressive style which he did plenty in his career. Obviously his firepower is not on the level of SRL but he was extremely accurate and could really pick his spots well when he wanted to switch gears.
     
  4. scandcb

    scandcb Active Member Full Member

    1,029
    1,209
    Jun 9, 2020
    All of this could have been said about Duran who was a better boxer than Mayweather.

    Guess what? Duran got smashed.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  5. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,723
    10,059
    Mar 7, 2012
    How was it pointless aggression, IF he was AWARDED the rounds?

    Floyd covered up a lot, and Oscar threw and landed shots.

    He was awarded points for that.

    Floyd didn’t win rounds where he covered up and let Oscar unload on him.

    That happened frequently in the fight.

    Oscar also troubled Floyd with the jab.

    It was a close fight until Floyd clearly pulled away at the end.

    It was certainly a hard enough fight for him to turn down millions of dollars for a rematch.

    It was a hard win.


    Thomas Hearns was superior to Oscar in every way.

    Yet you guys are under the illusion that Floyd would have won a decision by fighting offensively against him.

    It just goes against everything that we actually saw in real time.

    Your analysis is based on what you would have wanted to have happened, but not on what would realistically have happened, based upon all of the available evidence that we have to hand.
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2021
    scandcb likes this.
  6. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    9,196
    Oct 22, 2015
    If you fought some of the stiffs he fought, you would be considered a defensive savate
    What weight did they fight at again?
     
    Loudon and scandcb like this.
  7. Zulu King

    Zulu King Member banned Full Member

    204
    134
    Jun 17, 2021

    Nope , never suggested Floyd had to fight outside of his regular style. Floyd just needs to fight the way he does, why change your whole style ?
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,723
    10,059
    Mar 7, 2012
    What??

    Diego Corrales had the SAME reach as Floyd.

    He had above average boxing skills?

    Ha!

    Yeah.

    Thomas Hearns had GREAT boxing skills and a HUGE 78” reach.


    Why have you even typed up this nonsense?


    I said that Floyd never even saw anybody that was comparable to a prime version of Thomas Hearns.

    He fought nobody who had Hearns’ size, skills and power.

    Yet you have come forward and put up Diego Corrales, who was 5’10, with a 70” reach, and who didn’t have anywhere near as much ability.

    Pointless.

    Diego Corrales didn’t even resemble Thomas Hearns.

    Stop being silly.

    They didn’t even share any similarities.


    Floyd made light work of Corrales, which would have meant that he’d have beaten Hearns??

    Fighting Corrales told us NOTHING about how a match up with Hearns would have played out?

    Different fighters, different sizes, different attributes.

    I’m baffled.


    Wilfredo Benitez was at least very comparable to Floyd.


    Floyd had a great defence. But we keep telling you that to beat Hearns on a decision, he’d have needed to have fought very offensively in order to have won the majority of the rounds. But the trouble with that, is in doing so, he’d have left himself vulnerable to Hearns’ arsenal coming from a 78” reach.
     
  9. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    9,196
    Oct 22, 2015
    Personally he wouldn't have beaten prime ODH in my opinion. The Delohoya he faced was clearly not the same fighter that he was some 6-7 yrs prior. When he was at his best.
    He was doing what took its toll on him. Retire , party, fight. Same thing that took its toll on R. Leonard.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  10. Zulu King

    Zulu King Member banned Full Member

    204
    134
    Jun 17, 2021

    And Tommy never faced anyone with a similar style as Floyd who was on that level, so what exactly is your point
     
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,723
    10,059
    Mar 7, 2012
    Do you even read the posts?


    It’s not just reach.

    It’s not just power.

    It’s reach AND power, along with skills and a huge difference in size.

    A complete package.


    We know that Floyd beat guys who had lots of power.

    We know that Floyd beat people who possessed a reach advantage over him.

    This is not new information to us.

    What we’re saying is, Floyd never fought or beat ANYBODY who had BOTH of those attributes TOGETHER, as well as the overall ability that Hearns had.


    Putting forward Corrales was completely pointless.

    Apart from having good power, he didn’t share any other attributes that Hearns possessed.


    We have dismissed your example of Diego Corrales, simply because it is completely IRRELEVANT.
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2021
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,723
    10,059
    Mar 7, 2012
    Nobody has said that Hearns was unbeatable.

    We have only said that Floyd wouldn’t have beaten him due to how they’d have matched up stylistically.

    Yes, Floyd would have been easily hit by point scoring shots, by a guy who had great speed and a huge reach.
     
  13. Guru88

    Guru88 Active Member Full Member

    1,023
    1,353
    Sep 6, 2020
    Stylistic nightmare for Mayweather, he has very very little chance of winning this fight
     
    Loudon likes this.
  14. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,723
    10,059
    Mar 7, 2012
    A 6 inch reach advantage.
     
    scandcb likes this.
  15. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,723
    10,059
    Mar 7, 2012
    Okay.

    But why in this fantasy match up is Hearns tiring?

    It’s a defensive Floyd Mayweather fighting a chess match against another great fighter in Thomas Hearns.

    A slow paced fight.

    No pressure or aggression from Floyd.

    A tactical fight.

    Hearns didn’t have stamina issues like Oscar.

    Hearns only wilted against strength, pressure and power.

    Floyd wouldn’t have brought that.

    Floyd’s output would have been low, as he’d have been concerned about the jab and the huge power that Hearns possessed.

    There’s no reason to believe that Hearns would have gassed like he did against Leonard.

    So let me ask you this:

    What if Hearns hadn’t have gassed?

    Then what?
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2021