Floyd Mayweather would own Jake LaMotta and Robinson

Hey, i haven't mentioned Jones or even been in the discussion. I've always said Jones was one of the hardest fighters in history to hit. Many will argue he had to be*


* Not neccessarily moi

 

I had a big debate with senya on the merits on hearns punching at 160 which he considers not special!!! I mean maybe we should ask roldan and hagler about that?

senya: jones was schooled at ****,he got completely knocked the **** out by two ordinary fighters in his thirties,robinson was never stopped by punches in 201 contest lasting till he was an old geezer at 45.....
Why do you love roy soo much your objectivity goes out of the window?
I remeber you said kesslers jab was one of the greatest of all times until calzaghe outjabbed him over the latter part of the fight....what gives senya? WHY? why do you make such ridiculous statements and then not retract them?
ps; after 2003 was when the balco scandal made it hard for him to take his designer steroids and thus we see the consequent spiralling downfall of roid jones.....

 

I bet floyd cant even spell 'greatest of all time'......
ps; doppelganger,you are a silly sausage.....

 

Hearns' record at 160lb is a factual proof of him not being a big puncher there.

Jones was stopped by two best light heavyweights beside himself at the time of their fights. Ray Robinson was knocked down by guys like Mitsos Grispos 1-14-3 and Wilf Greaves 34-20-1 and 34-21-1. Imagine Jones getting knocked down by Ricky Randall or Rollin Williams twice.

 

****ing hell so floyd is the greatest fighter of all time now.

 

You do surely realise that with the exception of LaMotta who was the only man to beat Ray at his peak, every other loss Ray suffered happened when he was already on the decline or was a mere shell of his former self.

 

...So this feverishly compiled BoxRec list is your measure of Robinson? Pathetic.

God knows what you must think of Ike Williams, Joe Brown and Bob Montgomery.

 

firstly.don't bring my late mother into any of your posts even in jest got it?secondly mr boxrec. all your proving is what a silly little boy you are by listing his losses.the guy lost only one of his first 134 fights for christs sake.when he lost to turpin which was only his 2nd one he was thirty.other posters have allready put you down for most of the others listed, half of them when he was over forty.

 

Nobody is claiming that except Floyd himself or his trainer. But that doesn't mean just because some fighters are legends, they easily wipe out any modern fighter. We are talking about one of the best technicians of all time, who has gone undefeated and won title at 5 weights separated by 24 pounds. Anybody who's claiming he's gonna get wiped out easily doesn't know what he's talking about.

 

actually i'm a great admirer of floyd.i just don't think he beats those guys thats all.

 

Grow up *******