Floyd Mayweather's drug testing demands a welcome sight to USADA's Travis Tygart

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by untmike, Jan 21, 2010.


  1. untmike

    untmike ABN Full Member

    1,763
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Floyd Mayweather's drug testing demands a welcome sight to USADA's Travis Tygart

    By David Mayo | The Grand Rapids Press

    January 21, 2010, 9:00AM

    Travis Tygart, dragged unwittingly into the failed Floyd Mayweather-Manny Pacquiao negotiations, nevertheless did not mind. And now that Mayweather again is demanding comprehensive, random, Olympic-style blood and urine testing for a fight against admitted former steroid user Shane Mosley -- and, in fact, for any future opponent -- Tygart’s perspective remains on the front burner.

    Tygart is chief executive of the U.S. Anti-Doping Association, the organization responsible for Olympic drug testing in this country.

    Both camps sought his advice in the Mayweather-Pacquiao talks, one obviously with greater interest than the other, before the negotiation failed this month.

    Tygart called the urine testing used by boxing commissions across this country “a joke.” And with Grand Rapids native Mayweather trend-setting for improved standards, Tygart’s position on how boxing screens for performance-enhancing drugs has forced the sport to consider whether its stance is outdated.

    Cory Olsen | The Grand Rapids PressFloyd Mayweather's camp demanded Olypmic-style random blood testing or a fight with Manny Pacquiao and negotiations fell through.For years, it was assumed steroids only could help heavyweights, in a sport where making a weight limit otherwise is requisite.

    That was before 154-pounders Fernando Vargas and Mariano Carrera, and 126-pounder Orlando Salido, all tested positive for steroids after championship bouts in 2002, and Mosley testified in the BALCO investigation that he used them before a 147-pound fight the next year.

    “It amazes me. I’m not even sure how to respond to such a misperception,” Tygart said of the outdated thinking. “Where has the sport been for the past 10 years, seriously? Candidly, it’s impossible for me to believe that that perception exists about the sport. I think it’s easier to stick your head in the sand and just say ‘We’re not going to do anything about it.’

    “When you’ve got 14-year-old in-line roller skaters doping, and you’ve got drugs like insulin, and human growth hormone, and designer steroids, and EPO, and transfusions, that would be extremely potent and effective for a boxer -- even one attempting to cut weight -- then you throw in the whole diuretics and masking agents, the things that you would use along with those drugs to assist you in cutting weight, it’s a ripe area for a doper.”

    With a little knowledge and minimal expense, potent performance-enhancers, undetectable via urine testing, can transform a workaday world champion into “the strongest, fittest, pound-for-pound best boxer, with the most punch,” Tygart said.

    AP File PhotoTravis TygertIn fact, Mosley -- who has posted on his Web site that he would agree to blood testing -- passed Nevada’s drug tests during the time he was using steroids.

    “They don’t test for EPO,” Tygart said. “They don’t test for designer steroids. They test for a basic, simple menu that anybody with a heartbeat will escape. I just hate to hear that Shane Mosley did something really sophisticated to get around their testing. No, he didn’t. He would’ve been caught dead to rights in our program. But it doesn’t take a lot to sidestep the simple kind of drug testing that these state commissions are doing.”

    Tygart said the only way to accurately monitor athletes is through “true, no-notice testing,” adding that with a few hours’ notice, any athlete can mask his or her use of performance-enhancers.

    Mayweather-Pacquiao talks ultimately broke apart when Mayweather yielded to a 14-day window before their proposed fight when there would be no blood testing, while Pacquiao only would grant a 24-day window.

    “If that’s the case, the other piece is that, prior to that 14-day or 24-day blackout period, what system was in place?” Tygart said. “Were you just using the Nevada, or the state of California, system? If that’s the case, I’m not worried about the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period, I’m worried about the rest of it.”

    Blood testing apparently will not be the sticking point for Mayweather-Mosley that it was for Mayweather-Pacquiao.

    It could, however, have a broader impact on how boxing addresses the issue.

    “At the end of the day, our interest is the interests of clean athletes,” Tygart said. “So anyone, Mayweather or otherwise, who stands up and says ‘I want the best program to protect my right to compete,’ we’re going to support him."
     
  2. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    It's a very good read that separates the facts from the myths you read on here.
     
  3. Norbix

    Norbix Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,434
    0
    Aug 26, 2009
    The Grand Rapids Press.

    Otherwise, I'm in agreement.
     
  4. Fab2333

    Fab2333 Needs to Get It 2Gether Full Member

    5,359
    2
    Oct 25, 2006
    great read. I agree 100% with it.
    Its amazing how fans cant put aside their "fanhood" for either boxer to see the big picture. What couldve been the biggest fight in boxing history, no1 cares to have the solace that both fighters were 100% clean. It has been reduced to ducking and all this other bs. I hope they implement Olympic Style random drug testing for boxing, hell for all sports. To end this steroid threat.
     
  5. BOSTONREDSOX

    BOSTONREDSOX The Ghost Full Member

    2,048
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
    couldn't agree more but until then mayweather should have went by the nsac rules if he really wanted this fight.he new what the rules were before he even brought up pac as an opponent. and he should have lobbied for it a looooooooooooong time ago if his intentions are true
     
  6. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    this article insinuates a whole bunch of accusations with stating them clearly because they would be false. They should have mentioned that Pac offered a compromise more stringent testing than is the norm and that would have been able to test for EPO, HGH, and all these other drugs.
     
  8. BOSTONREDSOX

    BOSTONREDSOX The Ghost Full Member

    2,048
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
    why doesn't joyboy go to congress
    hell give john mccain a call he is all for a US boxing commision that oversees all state commisions
    floyd is full of **** thats why :yep
     
  9. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Do they want people to give him the Nobel Prize,hell the guy asked for blood tests cause he was scared of getting hurt and people act like he found the cure for cancer.
     
  10. IPitydaFo0l

    IPitydaFo0l ATG in the making Full Member

    1,684
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    I'm sure no one has an issue with stricter testing.
    It's the matter of when it came about....right as negotiations were about to start or were actually already under way. What the hell is that all about?
     
  11. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    I'm sure USADA stand's to make no profit from this. I'm also sure that all US Pro Leagues already do blood testing. I'm sure that urine testing is completely useless.

    I'm sure I'm sure, are you sure?
     
  12. Rapid

    Rapid Member Full Member

    380
    0
    Jan 21, 2010
    USADA is a non profit organization. It is funded by the government.
     
  13. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    29,202
    18,617
    Jul 19, 2004
    That is half true. The US government pays it to test athlete for Olympic, Pan American and Paralympic sport in the United States. It is a non-governmental agency and a non-profit.

    If boxing wants to use them then the boxing committees will have to pay. This is not a charity organization. You want their work, you pay. They will not charge you to the point they make a profit but you are going to pay.

    So yes the guys running the organization stands to profit with more people using them. The cost of running the staff will be factored into the price of the test.
     
  14. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    It's just all sunshine with Tygart. Long read for the book worms.

    http://rant-your-head-off.com/WordPress/?p=240

    And yet, Tygart seems pretty proud of their 100% conviction rate. Common sense suggests that of 165 cases, at least a few of those charges were questionable, and very likely a few innocent athletes have been sanctioned. The system is so stacked against the accused right now, that it’s pretty hard to imagine someone winning in arbitration. Point of fact, in the 34 cases that went to arbitration, USADA’s won them all. Not everyone has the resources to fight. Of the 131 who copped to the charges, how many were innocent? Truth is, we don’t know. But it’s likely that at least a few could have been innocent, but were lacking in the resources to fight back.
     
  15. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    they're not rules, they are guidelines, and that is why almost everything is negotiated


    the rules are things like "no hitting below the belt"