Floyd Mayweathers Future Opponents: Pacquiao, Cotto, Khan, then Retirement = Legacy!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cellz831, Dec 9, 2011.


  1. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    not his obligation. u ***s claim floyd is ducking serg but how u dont call manny the ducker
     
  2. casian72

    casian72 Active Member Full Member

    1,106
    13
    Jun 29, 2010
    I know Sunnn is trying to make valid points but when your point of view is skewed towards a particular fighter then your opinion is biased. So from a Pacfan point of view you are correct but from a boxing or neutral point of view your absolutely wrong.
     
  3. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    i made him my ***** in this thread :yep:good
     
  4. casian72

    casian72 Active Member Full Member

    1,106
    13
    Jun 29, 2010
    no u didn't cuz he is already a *****. you made him your EXTREME *****!
     
  5. Spman20999

    Spman20999 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Nope, not in the least. I consider that to be a total bull**** win, especially since it was the first time JMM had been even close to that weight. The fact that Mayweather didn't even bother to honour the catch-weight makes it even more shameful.

    However, we were not talking about Floyd Vs. JMM, we were talking about Martinez Vs. Floyd. Have you ever heard the saying "two wrongs do not make a right"? Now, are you aware that an attempt to argue that one wrong action justifies another is a logical fallacy? Just so you know, a logical fallacy is when your argument is undeniably incorrect; unlike opinions, logical fallacies can be safely ignored as they are clearly incorrect.

    The moral of this story is that if you want people to take you seriously you should make sure that your arguments don't suck.