Floyd Most Overrated WW Resume in History ?

And yuou cannot even come up with a propper counter? atsch

****, I even explained WHY in my post, and yet, you just pull this fanboy ****.

Let me why you think my post was to bad. Try doing so without acting like a biased fan...

 

Wasn't Zab the welterweight champ that Floyd had signed to fight him before he lost to Baldomir. Wasn't Floyd accused of ducking Baldomir. Didn't Carlos have the belt and ranked number 1 welterweight by some at the time
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Duran/Coyote_072506.htm

Wasn't people coming out and asking for Floyd to fight Ricky Hatton and accused him of ducking Ricky. Also wasn't he ranked in the top 10 p4p http://sports.yahoo.com/box/news?slug=ki-091307boxingpoll

But Floyd is too much of a coward to take on the best welterweight in the world. Shane has more speed and power than any of Floyd's opponents. He'll duck him just like what Pacquiao did because if Shane hits Mayweather once then he'll be out:tired

 

Again...the bext boxer on the planet needed a tune up at 147 vs. a former JrWW? How does that work? Shouldn't a REAL tune up be against a guy actually IN that division? :huh

I'm aware Floyd is allowed a tune up puving up (*COUGH* Pac vs. Diaz which everyone calls cherrypicking...). But he chose an old, bloated JrWW who had been KTFO almost right before.

 

My counter is why bother countering idiocy?

 

Delete.

 

Yeah...everyoe would say he's ducking a fighter everyon knows he'd easily beat in Baldomir. atsch Face it, it was mainly Floyd fans who wanted that fight. It was hella easy way to win a belt.

And people wanted Hatton vs. Mayweather at 140, but had no chouce bu to accept 147. You're playing revisionist history.

 

Delete

 

Three posts from you telling me how wrong I am, and you cannot even come up with a reason why.

I even had the courtesy to explain, and that sitll wasn't good enough. Instead you choose to act like a baby..:roll:

 

Baldomir was linear. The fans demanded that Floyd fight him. You don't have to like it, but it's a fact.

 

Mayweather

This content is protected

59%
Marquez

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Of course that's not what counts, Erik Morales couldn't beat Zahir Raheem so does that make Raheem better?

Any way you want to dress it up Judah is better than Clottey, he has more titles, he's a multi division champion, he's been in the P4P top 10 and he has a better resume.

Clottey's career best win was a narrow points victory over a past prime Judah ffs.

 

you dont really believe in what you say do you? :-(

 

Lienar doesn't mean **** anymore. You guys have this stygma that being lienar somehow trumps ALL other titleholders. There isn't much of a difference these days.

And no, the fans didn't demand it. FLOYD demanded it.

 

Head to head, yes, Raheem was better. IS that all you can do to show Judah is better, bring up OTHER fighters that don't even matter?

If Judah was better then Clottey, WHY didn't he beat him?

 

Lance you've never been in a boxing ring have you?