Floyd never fought anyone?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Illstate, Nov 16, 2007.


  1. Illstate

    Illstate Active Member Full Member

    756
    9
    Jun 22, 2006
    I would appreciate it if you think Floyd has a questionable resume. If you could please name a fighteranywhere up to Welterweight that "both" has a better resume, and that you feel could beat him right now.
    Don't worry I'll wait.
    Also be advised that any attempt to name someone that fits these requirements could automatically make you a candidate for liar of the year.
    Also any comments other than a "So and So's resume is better and he would beat Floyd" Will automatically give you Hater status.
     
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Shane Mosley!

    Oh wait.
     
  3. Illstate

    Illstate Active Member Full Member

    756
    9
    Jun 22, 2006
    Good one, and you are excused from the liar of the year nomination, as well as hater status.
    I'll bet thos possitions will be filled within the next couple of replies though
     
  4. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    :scaredas:

    Is that you Bitchtime??

    Dont worry i'll wait??

    :yikes

    :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-(

    Its not about who currently has abetter LEGACY than Floyd:nono

    Its about fighting the BEST OPPOSITION.

    Name a division Floy Unified or Cleaned out!!:yep

    At 47 Floyd's the Champ. But if he doesnt face Cotto and then the Winner of Williams vs Cintron?? ITS BULL****!! Real ATG's sought out the best.

    Those are clearly the relevant WW fights against prime opposition that would be a first for Floyd in beating all the supposed Champs/Contenders to the throne.

    Posts like that AUTOMATICALLY make you candidate for Delusional ******* of the WEEK AWARD:good
     
  5. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,483
    2,091
    Nov 11, 2006
    I always thought it was a decent resume to have fought Hernandez(both of them), Corrales, Jesus Chavez, JLC, Ndou, and Corley...
    (I dont think theres any other decent ones though)
    Not all great names, but all good competition, and he DEMOLISHED most of them...

    Than again, he really hasnt done much at welter..
     
  6. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,748
    8,264
    Feb 11, 2005
    PBF's resume is awfully good (and, yes, C Money, I am well aware that there are some names missing on his ledger. :D), and it's tough to think of a fighter at 147lbs that I'd pick to beat him at this point.

    Fighting Hatton (and DLH) is a good indication that he's stepping up his competition once again; if he gets by RH, then it'll be intertesting to see who he faces next. If it's a legit threat at 147lbs (say, a Top 5 fighter at the weight), then he'll warrant further praise. Let's see what happens.
     
  7. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    Ok his resume is good but is it great? In the sense of the SRR, SRL type great? I think not.

    All I'm saying is that despite a few names missing, he has the opportunity at 47 to do what certainly the real ATG's WOULD DO.

    Based on Floyds actions, statements, and history? Its very likely that he attempts to or avoids/ducks Cotto andthe Williams vs Cintron winners.

    He's never laid it down, always choosing his spots!! :nono
     
  8. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    check Paul Spadafora's resume...it speaks for itself
     
  9. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    nuff said on that one:scaredas:
     
  10. Johnnyblaze

    Johnnyblaze Active Member Full Member

    1,052
    6
    Mar 1, 2006
    Floyd's the #1p4p fighter in the world because roy got ko'd and hopkins lost to taylor. manny is #2 because he fought and beat 2 of boxing's most POPULAR (not best) fighters.
     
  11. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    The original post is ridiulous. Your basic defence for sayign that Floyd has got a good resume, is the opinion that nobody can beat him. What has him being beatable got to do with his resume? Nothing at all. They are two seperate points. It's just a pointless argument. Laughable, actually.
     
  12. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    4,483
    2,091
    Nov 11, 2006
    :deal I love this guy... Every post you make, no matter how smart ass, is always on the money haha.
     
  13. Illstate

    Illstate Active Member Full Member

    756
    9
    Jun 22, 2006
    Congratulations!! You didn't name anyone, And you topped it off with name calling. You're gonna be hard to beat
     
  14. Illstate

    Illstate Active Member Full Member

    756
    9
    Jun 22, 2006
    No the point was not that no one can beat him so his resume is good. My point is to hell with his resume. Beat him in the ring or leave him alone.
    The point of the post was to see if anyone would answer the question or answer with that non sense.
    your response didn't really qualify as nonsense, but if you re read the original post and get a sense of where I was going with it you may want to reply again.
    Any reasonable person would speak on who a man has lost to, or who he does not have the skills to beat rather than what the records and age of the people he beat in his undefeated career looks like.
    I mean who didn't get that point?
    Maybe I didn't make it clear.
     
  15. Illstate

    Illstate Active Member Full Member

    756
    9
    Jun 22, 2006
    This reply is a fine example of how grown men should debate issues on a message board. I'll honor that. I wouldn't exatly say his resume is better than Floyd's though