I would appreciate it if you think Floyd has a questionable resume. If you could please name a fighteranywhere up to Welterweight that "both" has a better resume, and that you feel could beat him right now. Don't worry I'll wait. Also be advised that any attempt to name someone that fits these requirements could automatically make you a candidate for liar of the year. Also any comments other than a "So and So's resume is better and he would beat Floyd" Will automatically give you Hater status.
Good one, and you are excused from the liar of the year nomination, as well as hater status. I'll bet thos possitions will be filled within the next couple of replies though
:scaredas: Is that you Bitchtime?? Dont worry i'll wait?? :yikes :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( Its not about who currently has abetter LEGACY than Floyd:nono Its about fighting the BEST OPPOSITION. Name a division Floy Unified or Cleaned out!!:yep At 47 Floyd's the Champ. But if he doesnt face Cotto and then the Winner of Williams vs Cintron?? ITS BULL****!! Real ATG's sought out the best. Those are clearly the relevant WW fights against prime opposition that would be a first for Floyd in beating all the supposed Champs/Contenders to the throne. Posts like that AUTOMATICALLY make you candidate for Delusional ******* of the WEEK AWARD:good
I always thought it was a decent resume to have fought Hernandez(both of them), Corrales, Jesus Chavez, JLC, Ndou, and Corley... (I dont think theres any other decent ones though) Not all great names, but all good competition, and he DEMOLISHED most of them... Than again, he really hasnt done much at welter..
PBF's resume is awfully good (and, yes, C Money, I am well aware that there are some names missing on his ledger. ), and it's tough to think of a fighter at 147lbs that I'd pick to beat him at this point. Fighting Hatton (and DLH) is a good indication that he's stepping up his competition once again; if he gets by RH, then it'll be intertesting to see who he faces next. If it's a legit threat at 147lbs (say, a Top 5 fighter at the weight), then he'll warrant further praise. Let's see what happens.
Ok his resume is good but is it great? In the sense of the SRR, SRL type great? I think not. All I'm saying is that despite a few names missing, he has the opportunity at 47 to do what certainly the real ATG's WOULD DO. Based on Floyds actions, statements, and history? Its very likely that he attempts to or avoids/ducks Cotto andthe Williams vs Cintron winners. He's never laid it down, always choosing his spots!! :nono
Floyd's the #1p4p fighter in the world because roy got ko'd and hopkins lost to taylor. manny is #2 because he fought and beat 2 of boxing's most POPULAR (not best) fighters.
The original post is ridiulous. Your basic defence for sayign that Floyd has got a good resume, is the opinion that nobody can beat him. What has him being beatable got to do with his resume? Nothing at all. They are two seperate points. It's just a pointless argument. Laughable, actually.
Congratulations!! You didn't name anyone, And you topped it off with name calling. You're gonna be hard to beat
No the point was not that no one can beat him so his resume is good. My point is to hell with his resume. Beat him in the ring or leave him alone. The point of the post was to see if anyone would answer the question or answer with that non sense. your response didn't really qualify as nonsense, but if you re read the original post and get a sense of where I was going with it you may want to reply again. Any reasonable person would speak on who a man has lost to, or who he does not have the skills to beat rather than what the records and age of the people he beat in his undefeated career looks like. I mean who didn't get that point? Maybe I didn't make it clear.
This reply is a fine example of how grown men should debate issues on a message board. I'll honor that. I wouldn't exatly say his resume is better than Floyd's though