Floyd on ESPN 1000

Floyd a G.

 

tired of this already, every floyd/pac message gets a overkill off threads and attention in a few days.
Im off to bed:dead

 

it's undeniable that Manny fights Floyds scraps, surely *******s can't even deny this.

 

:roll:

 

DLH and Hatton, now Mosley. Floyd could have fought Cotto, Margarito and Clottey and no one would be arguing his p4p position.

He chose not too.

Not Manny's fault.

 

He has reason and you has good points too. In my point of view Manny Paq is taking too much attention or too much press by beating weight drained opponents. If he is so good, why he did not mop the floor with Marquez?? Why fight weigh drained opponents?? Pac has been in the easy route and in 135 pounds Marquez took the hardest fighters, Manny the easier ones. I,m not saying that Pac is a bad fighter. He is an awesome animal, the same you can said of Floyd. You can destory and opponent in the way that Floyd does without taking punishment. After the Floyd fight, Hatton was devasted. he was a shadow of himself. Did you see his next 2 fights, even Malignaggi hurt him in the 9 round or ones of this rounds. Malignaggi has cotton punches. What so many people dont see or forget is that Floyd is a very hard puncher, not Tito Trinidad neither Oscar, But when you can keep boxers like Mosley at bay with arm lenght punches, is very clear that they have much strenght in them. How is possible that Cotto goes to 11 rounds with judah is a dog fight meanwhile Floyd has Judah devasted in 5 rounds?? Floyd put the punches with precision where he wants and that does a lot of damage, that is why his opponents after 5 rounds look like ****, Tired, winded and weak. But Floyd has the God talent ability to do that without taking damage. Pac goes with brute strengh and takes a lot of punches in return. To said that Pac is one of the best and not mention Floyd who has been much more dominnat than Pac is a fault of repect to Floyd and to boxing. But both fighters employ very different tactics, but has stamina to fight 20 rounds and both train like animals. That is why both are in a league of their own. I'm pretty sure that Floyd will beat Manny, and that does not said that Manny is a bad fighter, or if Manny beast Floyd it does not mean the same. But both are all time greats. But you must remember that all fighters need fights that are not as tought. I'm my opinion Floyd has the edge, and belive it or not Floyd has been evaded for boxers for a long time. Now that it means a good $$$$ is that almost everyone wants to fight him. At 140 pounds Arum did not let Cotto fight Floyd because he was inmature, Hatton said not me, that he was not ready and Tysu never fought back after the Hatton Fight. Then why people said that he did cherry pick opponents?? He wants to fight Mosley at 135, and Mosley goes for a de la hoya fight. Mosley decision is the most intelligent for the $$. He was not scared, he did not take that risk and goes for a risk with a better $$$ at that time. At 147 Cotto did not generate $$$$ as Oscar and Hatton. Floyd was waiting to fight him when the money was right. But Cotto takes the beating of his life vs Margarito and was almost kill by Pac. And the pac floyd fight has not happen because Pac did not agree with blood testing procedures. Thats all. If Pac in that time agrees with that, right know we were waiting for the rematch and not the first fight. To me the most difficult thing that prevent this fight to happen is the fight between the promoters and not the fighters. Both want 50 million and both are near the end of their careers although they are still as good as before. In the end you can end the career of any fighter giving the punishment that Floyd applied in 12 rounds of 100% perfect punches in the right places or the storm of punches that Pac throws. Both are lethal, Both are all time greats in their respective styles. I'm fanatic or both. But in my opinion Floyd is the perfect fighter.

 

Just another opinion by another person. What makes this any more relevant than the opinions of those in these forums?

 

Amidst the quagmire of stupidity on these forums you can find incidences of sound reason. His 'reasoning' sounded like it came from a the other side, that of a Pacquiao fan. There is truth to both sides. To say Mayweather's argument is completely fallacious is a refusal of the facts. His argument for 'turning it around' was weak also.

 

Not sure who 'you people' is. Sound reason is sound reason and bias is bias... simple as that. Don't know who he is or is not a fan of, but good journalism practices objectivity, which examines both sides of an argument. Not just one.

Problem with you people is that you assume to much.

 

:deal BUT PUNKS LIKE MR. WONDERFUL CAN SEE BUT WON'T, SO THEY STAY TO HATING