Floyd: Pac will never ger a 50/50 split

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hofbrau, Aug 30, 2012.


  1. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I still want to see this fight.... It wont mean as much as it would have 2 years ago, but would still be better than most other fights for Pac and Floyd.
     
  2. greg turchy

    greg turchy Guest

    JMM is the reason the fight lost its shine..

    after the 3rd Pac fight people realized Pac isn't on the same level as Mayweather.
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    8-1 underdog ortiz wasnt on floyds level either but he had no problem fighting him :rofl
     
  4. greg turchy

    greg turchy Guest

    At least he had a title..
     
  5. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    So they should ignore the revneue numbers, income, and ppv numbers is what your saying?:huh

    How does that make for good business?:think

    My saying is that they should follow the past numbers amongst common opponents. That's the most fair way to do it.

    So with that said, and I'm telling you that my saying is based 95% on the numbers (PPV #'s, revenue produced, income of each fighter), with other small factors being my other 5% as to why one fighters deserves more or less, that I'm wrong for thinking that way?

    You don't even see that your way guarantee's one fighter (Manny) to make more than double anything he has ever made, while the other fighter would take a paycut from fighting Shane Mosley, Victor Ortiz, and Miguel Cotto.

    Your way says a guarantee'd 40 percent to the loser...Floyd gets raped at the table as this would guarantee Manny almost double anything he has ever made if he lost.
     
  6. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    so did 8 other people at 147. they mean so much these days
     
  7. SHADOW BOX

    SHADOW BOX SHADOW BOX Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Jun 25, 2008
    yes, or else the fight will not be made; their egos are too big (haven't you noticed?). No one will budge. I am speaking as a fan of boxing. All this talk is the reason we don't see fights that we want to see. Sad that even the fans see it the money way. Make the fight, winner gets 60 percent, hell make it 70 percent for the winner. The winner will make more money.
     
  8. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    He also won it a catchweight, still his only win against a top 10 type opponent in 5 tries
     
  9. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    Dude, 60/40 is very generous to Floyd, it'd mean he's a 50% better draw. The numbers don't add up for that.

    You're also serving up a lot of dodgy numbers, foremost that Pac would be making twice his career best with Floyd's 40m offer. It's nowhere near, more like 10% above his best.
     
  10. greg turchy

    greg turchy Guest

    Ortiz did not win his title at a catchweight....just stop it..
     
  11. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
  12. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'm not one bit surprised you didn't know about the CW for that fight.
     
  13. greg turchy

    greg turchy Guest

  14. greg turchy

    greg turchy Guest

    You should know all about catchweights being you worship the CW king..
     
  15. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Your way leaves it with judges...see Lara-Williams or Whitaker-Chavez or Pacquiao-Marquez 3, or Pacquiao-Bradley...

    So that would leave temptation and corruption.

    On top of that, with your way, one fighter gets to make almost a double career high payday if he loses (Pacquiao), while another fighter would take a paycut if he lost (Mayweather).

    So that isn't fair and also would leave money in the hands of a judge which is a big no in boxing.