Floyd Patterson vs. Harry Wills

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Luigi1985, Sep 15, 2007.


  1. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
  2. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    712
    May 22, 2007
    I’m gonna go with Patterson via KO 8/9 I feel his hand speed would be to much and he would be beating Wills to the punch also he has underrated defence when coming forward his head movement was very good. If a past prime Langford can do it I believe a prime Patterson would.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,103
    Feb 15, 2006
    Wills seems to have been efective at neutralizing come forward fighters. I would cite his record against Langford and McVea in suport of this.

    Patterson could hit and he had faster hands than Langford and McVea but he did not have their durability. He was also not as mobile as Langford or strong as McVea. This would make it likley that Wills wears him down.
     
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,168
    15,160
    Jun 9, 2007
    Wills is another overatted fighter on this forum.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,103
    Feb 15, 2006
    Interesting viewpoint.

    I would say that he is about as far from being overated as you can get.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    Hard to say as we have very little film on Wills.
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Probably Wills but cant say without saying. Wills could range in ability from being GOAT to a Walcott/Charles level fighter

    As for the guy who talked about the Langford loss

    How many times did Wills beat Langford? 17? How many times did he lose 2-3?
     
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    The Langford vs Wills series was in Langford's favor early on. The matches were tied at 2-2, but Langford won his matches VIA KO. Wills took over the series as Langford abilities continued to decline due to age, and excessive ring activity.

    Sam MCvey won his first two fights vs Wills via decision. McVey was not a good boxer type, so this is interesting. Then as McVey's abilities began to decline due to age and excessive ring activity, Wills took over.

    The question here is, was Wills too green early when these fights happened 1914-1916? And how far past their best were McVey and Langford post 1916?

    It’s hard to say without the films. From what I've read on Wills, he was a good body puncher, a good clincher / wrestler, and had a big punch. However he did opt out of some matches with injury, and fouled out of some others. Wills' intangibles to me are a bit questionable. Wills chin might have been a bit questionable vs the better punchers, and some reports say he was not fast.

    History did not work out for Wills. Aside from not meeting Dempsey, Wills never fought Johnson, Tunney, or Godfrey. The Godfrey fight was offered a few times. It would have been a good one that matched two prime vs prime contenders for the colored title.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,788
    47,642
    Mar 21, 2007
    All due love and resepct to Patterson, but I don't see him beating Wills as I understand him. I accept that I might be overating Wills.

    Wills KO 5.


    Good post Mendoza.