Floyd schools Pacquaio in a lopsided UD win...

I fully expect Floyd to outbox Pacquiao. Pacquiao makes plenty of mistakes that most people don't or can't capitalize on. Floyd will pick them wide open. I won't think any less of Pacquiao for losing. He will be in against a better fighter.

 

Excellent post. If people actually followed the progression of Floyd's career, he has taken on the challenges that people wanted at the time. It is only post-fight that he gets ripped apart. I mean, people are complaining about his competition even now and saying that he was forced to fight Mosley, rather than just accepting the fact that he's fighting the best available opponent possible - and a guy that many claimed Floyd would never step foot in the ring with.

 

All Pacquiao has to do is take the test.

 

Then Floyd would be disqualified for cheating in the eyes of the fans, and rightfully so. Floyd would receive no credit for the win, and Pacquiao's legacy would grow. Floyd would lose spots on any objective all-time ranking list.

 

Another Fantasy fight! Of course Pac loses this. He always does! But in the real world, Pac will humiliate the TS again. He always does.

 

"Past results are not an indicator of future performance." Just because Pacquiao has surprised you in the past doesn't mean he will in the future.

 

TS speaks in the present tense, as if it is happening already. That is the problem with this TS and other PAC naysayers. They can't discern what is their fantasy and reality. And they always fall flat on their face. PAC always has lost a fantasy fight and actually won since 2005!

 

fantasy a better indicator than past results? You must be in dreamland

 

At least you, Marnoff, are better than the TS. You speak in the future tense when you predict. You recognize that fantasy is different from reality

 

Sure thing. Pacquiao should take the tests.

 

... and then take 55-45, then who knows what's next. :yep

 

Marnoff, PAC doesn't have to do any tests more than what is required by present regulations. The burden of proff is on the accusers, given that PAC has passed all previous tests.

Since you think he has to prove his innocence even if it is not his burden, it shows you are biased against him

 

After I logically showed you that you are wrong, you still insist. You are being a brat! Try to reason with me for a change!

 

What is the matter Marnoff. Run out of arguments? You should just shut up then! Signing off in 5 mins unless you respond

 

5 mins up.