Floyd should make cotto fight the williams/cintron winner

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007.


Page 4 of 8
  1. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006

    once again for the ******ed at ESB:

    Genaro Hernandez-130 ring/lineal WBC champ
    Jose Luis Castillo- 135 #1 ring ranked/Lineal WBC champ
    Arturo Gatti- 140 #1 ring ranked/WBC champ
    Carlos Baldomir-147 ring/lineal WBC champ
    Oscar De La Hoya-154 #3 ranked WBC champ

    floyd has never fought for a vacant title:deal when floyd beat gatti and oscar they were the WBC champion. when has cotto ever defeated another champion for his title:deal
     
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    #46
  2. DatBo215

    DatBo215 Active Member Full Member

    722
    0
    Jun 12, 2006
    who gives a **** about belts. Who is a better ww than cotto?? The only name that can be mentioned is mayweather. who is a better ww the mayweather?? the only argument can be made for cotto. thats why they should fight. forget the money forget the belts as a fan i want to see the best fight the best. floyd is #1 and cotto is #1A thats why they should fight end of story.
     
    DatBo215, Nov 12, 2007
    DatBo215, Nov 12, 2007
    #47
  3. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    quintana was not the champion...and are you saying quintana is more dangerous then cintron and williams:deal ricky hatton is more dangerous then carlos quintana:admin
     
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    #48
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    He fought Jose Louis Castillo for the vacant ring title you dumb****.:patsch

    And so what? Guys fight for vacant or stripped titles all the time. It's what you do AFTER winning a belt that makes you a champion. You're too busy suckin Mayweather **** to see past his nuts you ******.
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Nov 12, 2007
    Lance_Uppercut, Nov 12, 2007
    #49
  5. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,557
    Sep 28, 2007
    Cotto doesn't need to prove anything else, he's already champion and ready for the winner of Mayweather vs Hatton.
     
    Caliboxing, Nov 12, 2007
    Caliboxing, Nov 12, 2007
    #50
  6. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006

    cotto has to beat the unifier of the cintron/williams winner. If cotto can beat a dangerous welter like those two (where he will not be the bigger man) then he deserves to fight floyd. if he loses then the winner will fight floyd.

    the young guins in the 147 division need to fight each other to prove they can beat floyd and also generate interest in the unification fight.

    I want cotto to win against the winner of cintron/williams but he has to prove he can do it.:deal
     
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    #51
  7. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,557
    Sep 28, 2007
    He more than deserves to fight Floyd right now.
     
    Caliboxing, Nov 12, 2007
    Caliboxing, Nov 12, 2007
    #52
  8. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    the dumb **** is you:deal the ring is not a sanctioning body and castillo was the WBC champ:rofl nothing like lance logic:hey just go drink a beer and leave the intelligent boxing convo to the pro's

    you're right guys fight for vacant title all the time but floyd has never fought for a vacnt title.

    every title he has won in every weight class he has defeated a champion to do it. now lick a toilet bowl like a good doggie:thumbsup
     
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    #53
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    He doesn't need to you ****in moron. He's already proved to be a level above them. Maybe Floyd should prove he caqn beat a prime WW before COTTO allows him to fight him. Floyd winning belts at 140 & below don't mean **** @ 147.
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Nov 12, 2007
    Lance_Uppercut, Nov 12, 2007
    #54
  10. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006

    sorry I don't speak dog:deal
     
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    #55
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    You just said Originally Posted by bigtime9 -"floyd has never fought for a vacant title"

    And I just showed to you he had. You said NOTHING of sanctioning bodies *******.




    He never defeated the 135 Ring Champ for that belt. It was vacant between him and Castillo.

    You're so easy to own...    :rofl
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Nov 12, 2007
    Lance_Uppercut, Nov 12, 2007
    #56
  12. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    No, you **** em.:rofl

    And stick to the topic you little ****! :yep
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Nov 12, 2007
    Lance_Uppercut, Nov 12, 2007
    #57
  13. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    floyd defeated castillo for his wbc title he had defended 5 times before losing to floyd. nopw you can try and spin it 6 ways to sunday but castillo was the recognized linear champ at 135. when has cotto ever fought for a ring title:deal
     
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    bigtime9, Nov 12, 2007
    #58
  14. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    Why would you want to wait to see this fight? I don't understand.
     
    BobDigi5060, Nov 12, 2007
    BobDigi5060, Nov 12, 2007
    #59
  15. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Floyd is a ***** if he doesn't fight Cotto after this.
     
    BITCH ASS, Nov 12, 2007
    BITCH ASS, Nov 12, 2007
    #60
Page 4 of 8