He hadn't fought 42 fights until he beat Ortiz so he was not talking about any of his previous results.
I thought it was pretty obvious Floyd Sr. meant that Floyd Jr. would be 41-1 by the time he was done fighting him. He admitted so in an interview later. That was an ugly moment although I guess it made for good dramatic "reality" TV.
I am not a "*****" at all! I can't stand Floyd, Jr., but I believe firmly that he won both Castillo fights. I had him winning by two points in fight 1 and I am a fair judge. I am no "*******" either, for the record.
There are huge flaws with Compubox. It counts anything that ISN'T a jab as a power shot, weather that be a flush over hand right, or a pawed range finding straight shot. Likewise, if a fighter extends his left hand to judge distance, it counts it as a damn jab.
Hilarious all the Floyd fans getting upset. OP was trolling the *******s a month ago I guess next he'll take care of the Klit nuthuggers
Compubox means **** for me. It's a guy with a button scoring what he sees at the heat of the moment. It's even worst than amateur scoring system probably because the guy is probably not even ringside.
I don't pay much attention to Compubox. I have no problem with people saying Castillo beat Mayweather, but I don't care about Compubox. I kinda wish Castillo had gotten the decision, maybe Floyd wouldn't be such a cherry-picker and obsessed with his undefeated record.
but compubox is only considered flawed when it shows just how shitty a pound for pound undefeated braggart is when he got owned in every stat.....yeah its flawed, but its more credible than any ****ing judge
to the thread starter he was saying he'd put the 1 on floyds resume.cause how would he be saying floyd already lost when he had only had 41 fights??so how could he be 41-1?