Floyd Sr Tells Floyd Jr: "U R 41 & 1!"

The fact that he didnt know this is hilarious.

I swear, there's noplace like ESB!

 

No, he didn't

He said you'll be 41-1 mother****er

As in, I will beat your azz

At the time Floyd had only had 41 fights, Ortiz was the 42nd

****ing dumbass

 

floyd nut hugger

stfu

 

Well lets see Floyd out jabbed JLC by 8% and JLC out powerpunched Floyd by 2%, lol

Look it was a close fight, could have went either way (of course I think Floyd's early cushion rds 1-5, were enough to get the W)

Too remove any doubt, he immediately rematched him (didn't wait 3 and 4 years like another fighter) and made it look easy

 

yes..a pawing jab in reverse to get the guy off of him....that really counts as something..... dumbass

 

Do these moronic *******s, all belong to one of those wierd cults like that David Koresh mob?

How can people be so ****ing stupid as to not understand Mayweather Sr was threatening his son, with his first defeat if they fought, and not mentioning his previous fights is beyond me.

And to think these creeps have access to computers, so they can spread their garbage to the normal world, instead of their Walter Mitty world.

 

:rofl

 

This.

 

atsch You dont score a fight based on punches landed you ****ing moron !
This is really getting on my nerves. If you had him winning then fine, it was a close fight but to say he won because he landed more is idiotic and you should consider following a new sport.

 

everyone in the arena as well as HBOs judge and the HBO team thought floyd lost..... i guess they dont know **** either huh? ****ing tool

i didnt say he won because he landed more punches... but it at least backs up why i say he won dumbass...rather than just saying "floyd lost"

youre a bigger ****ing idiot for pointing out this out....yeah punch stats MEAN NOTHING....

 

Marquez beat Pacquiao's ass three times. Only *******s cant see that ha ha ha

 

This

 

Punchstats are **** and mean very little, I don't think they should be included (like harold leadermans unofficial scorecards) as they influence people's perceptions of who they think is winning rounds, when both are often quite off. Addtionally simply scoring punches landed can lead to a false impression of the fight. There is much more to judging than simply numbers, the cleanness and effect of the blow, the type of punch, etc etc, JMM-Pac III is a perfect example.

Secondly punchstats mean very little because fights are scored by ROUNDS.

A fighter can land more over the course of the entire fight but that isn't always indicitive of where the rounds went.

Good examples of this are counter-punchers vs pressure fighters.

You can have fighter A landing 10 punches to fighter B's 9 for 9 of the 12 rounds, then fighter B could have 3 rounds where he lands at a ratio of 12-5 or something similar, and punchstats would reflect that he landed more over the course of the fight but it wouldn't mean much.

 

Mayweather 2 Castillo 0

Try looking at the fight with the volume off sucka

Don't put stats up there and b--ch up when someone coments on those exact stats

 

Good job TS.