Funny you talks about boxing knowledge, when yours does not even register. I mean proof of that is right there to see " 10,000 life times " what a statement. How salty are Frauds testicles? What era are you on about anyway? or are you just a Naughtie it/they/her
Yeah the masterclass and schooling remarks just showed bias. Manny and Floyd were both shot imo. I favor Manny in 2009 but I also find it strange that random drug testing was an issue. Nonetheless Floyd got the decision although the cards were way off. Closer to 7-5/8-4 for me
Even if it was Manny was throwing the right hand with bad intention. Didnt seem to impede him in any way. I still think 2009 Manny beats 2009 Floyd though
Shut up dummy. You picked pac to beat pbf you don't know **** about boxing and proved it with that prediction.
The pac of 2009 still doesn't have any answers for the way pbf would control range and dictate distance on him and that's why he can't beat him.
Oh yeah it's well understood Pacquiao of 2009 hell perhaps even the 2012 would tornado his way through, plus even just boxing Floyd he showed his elite level skills & countering whereas all i had heard was Pacquiao can't box & gets hit too much years prior by the experts, Drug testing was never an issue due to Floyd being the one who was actually on them while diverting attention by pointing fingers, so much proof out there regarding his cheating now & even then on fight night besides injecting his hands he was also caught masking through an illegal IV which conveniently gets left out in that discussion.
No your wrong, I wanted Manny to win. And if that is how you judge knowledge about a sport, you REALLY DON'T KNOW **** about Boxing. But every poster on here knows that about you keep dreaming your wet dream