Floyd vs Pac PPV History

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Scratch2win28, May 26, 2010.


  1. kukoy

    kukoy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,404
    0
    Jun 13, 2006
    As almost everyone predicted should Pac agree to the 14-day cut-off, another fakking reason Floyd fans would try to come up with, if Floyd decides (or until he decides to) not to fight Pac.

    Good thing it was said before...
     
  2. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Good job. :good
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    All ***** about money, there's no fighter EVER that didn't ***** about money. If you're 12 years old and think these guys fight for glory and glory pays the bills then you're in for a ride as you hopefully grow up.
     
  4. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004

    Are these figures the US PPV figures only or worldwide?

    How is it that you work out an average of PPV revenues from 7 Floyd fights and 11 Pac fights?

    Should you work the average out from the 7 best PPV's they had?
     
  5. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    Pac would be even farther behind if we only count his 7 best ppvs. Not something you want to do with all these pacturds around. Just give him his whole 11.
     
  6. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    :huh

    You'd add each one up then divide by 11 or 7.
     
  7. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    numbers alone don't tell the whole story, you have to take into account the circumstances during those fights. for instance, you can't just compare pac-jmm against floyd-jmm. that was pre-dela hoya for pac, and that was a comeback fight for floyd who was fighting the #2 pfp.

    still, i would have to say floyd has been more succesful with PPV than pac, no doubt. but pac's numbers have been very impressive lately considering he's not american.
     
  8. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    I'm not a math genius. But, 100 divided by 7 and 100 divided by 11 are not the same.:patsch
     
  9. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    I think what can be compared is, despite 4 less PPVs, Mayweather has still outsold him by 500k
     
  10. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    No ****, because if you add Pacs revenue up, you'd divide by 11, because he's has 11 PPVs..

    If you do Mayweather you'd divide by 7.

    :patsch
     
  11. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    as should be the case. pac has been fighting at the lower weight classes for a longer time and was definitely less known in the US for some time. floyd edges this, no doubt.
     
  12. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    After he beat the **** out of Barrera he got quite a lot of following in the USA.
     
  13. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    Originally Posted by doomeddisciple
    This content is protected

    Are these figures the US PPV figures only or worldwide?

    How is it that you work out an average of PPV revenues from 7 Floyd fights and 11 Pac fights?

    Should you work the average out from the 7 best PPV's they had?


    DOOMEDDISCIPLE is questioning the TS about the average ppv of PAC n FLOYD. PAC average is smaller because the ts divided it to 11 compare to Floyd's 7.
     
  14. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Of course you divide it by 11, he's comparing their whole PPV career, not Pac's best 7 against Mayweathers 7.
     
  15. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    That makes absolutely no sense. Go back to 6th grade math class.