Floyd will go down as the most overrated boxer in history

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Exactabox, Sep 3, 2010.


  1. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Agreed. But he'll get in on popularity, not talent.
     
  2. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    1)hatton's prime ended with the olivera fight. no fault of floyd's but hatton was past it. and it's not about did floyd fight the best available: were they in their prime? no. were they that formidable? not really. no matter how you wanna spin it, they won't be remembered as great wins all time because of that.

    2)i think they both will get in to be honest.
     
  3. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    I call bull**** on your bull**** call. Every point you posted can be easily countered.

    He absolutely has great skills but his "ATG"resume is all smoke and mirrors.

    Unless he does something drastic within the next couple of years, The words duck and cherry-picking will always be synonymous with Floyd.
     
  4. THIBB

    THIBB Active Member Full Member

    557
    0
    Sep 1, 2010

    Thats your real argument of why PBF and pacroid is? :lol:
     
  5. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    and excitement. augustus is popularity but gatti is a fight of the year legend
     
  6. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    sentences work better when they make sense.
     
  7. THIBB

    THIBB Active Member Full Member

    557
    0
    Sep 1, 2010
    Didnt they say PBF was ducking SSM? they say this before alot of PBF fights... then he beats them and everyone says he was supposed to win.
     
  8. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Hatton was past it fighting olivera? What? Thats insane. His BEST wins came after that fight. How can he be past prime?


    Oscar and Mosley were beyond formidable. Both coming off brutal KO wins. Both fighters bigger, taller, longer then Floyd and outweighed him on fight night by close to 10lbs, atleast in Oscars case. Past prime? Maybe. Not dangerous, hardly.
     
  9. mr. piff

    mr. piff The Ring General Full Member

    3,992
    1
    Mar 17, 2010
    :deal
    T.S. Your letting your hate/emotions cloud your judgement. Floyd is far from the most overated fighter in history. Just wondering here but when they do fight (Pac/May) and if floyd beats him what would that make Pac in your eyes???
     
  10. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    There is no smoke and mirrors about going 15-0 against champions. Hell we just saw one of Floyds old victims Demarcus corley, who nobody rates give Marcos Miadan thought to be one of the best junior welters in the world absolute hell for 12 rounds.

    Floyds resume is beyond solid.
     
  11. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    1)yup. best wins, biggest wins, etc. hatton would have won bigger and better if he had taken those fights earlier in his career. watch hatton before KT and then after...there's a difference

    2)we'll disagree. you can make excuses all you want but the oscar that fought whitaker or even campas was not the same that floyd fought. the mosley that he fought was NOTHING like the one oscar fought. they were name fighters by the time floyd got to them...
     
  12. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Props to Floyd for taking the Mosley fight and for his performance but that doesn't erase the fact that Mosley-like All of Floyd's biggest wins- was clearly past his prime.

    That's where the cherry-picking part comes in.
     
  13. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    I've seen his old fights. He was more fundamentally sound, a better boxer, but that doesnt mean it was his prime. If he would have tried to box kosta Tszyu or Collazo or Castillo he would have gotten eaten. What made him a true champion was his brawler style. Doesnt mean he wasnt prime. He was only 30 years old.

    Of course not. He was slower, less pop and not as fast on his feet. However, he was bigger, stronger, a dangerous puncher, and a 10 year veteran. I.e Dangerous. Oscar that Floyd fought would have KO'd Margarito and beaten Cotto guaranteed.

    They were name fighters who were coming off brutalizing victories over fellow champions. Mosley was coming off a KO win over the best welterweight "allegedly" on the planet. The most feared man in boxing. Mosley was and still is a top 3 fighter at welterweight, aside from Pacquiao and Mayweather I wouldnt bet on anyone else beating him. To say he was just a "name" is silly.
     
  14. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    true, calling him a name fighter is selling him short but you can see where i'm coming from. you make the points yourself. no matter what way you look at it, wins over them are much like robinsons win over henry armstrong, toney's win over holyfield, or leonard's win over hagler. they weren't the same fighters they were in their prime and unless you have wins over great fighters when they were still great, your resume will always be limited
     
  15. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    Debate with a Floyd fan? Hahahahah, good one:good