Because he has bigger PPV numbers than Pac he's the proven draw with hard numbers to back it up. How many times does this have to be brought up? You *******s are delusional and clearly not living in the real world. These PPV numbers have been posted 1000 times but you still refuse to accept it, the very fact that your can't accept it shows how irrational people like you are. PBF is a bigger draw in boxing than Pac is deal with it.hi:
You sound like a typical ******* who knows nothing about how to analyze styles. You think just because a guy is aggressive and can KO people that no one can beat them. You're a casual boxing fan who hasn't studied this sport, just started watching it and only knows the basics. People, like you are shamed off of ESB everyday with their simplistic analysis and thoughts like "can't touch speed and excitement". Log off before I school your ass.:yep
People watch the Pacman because his fights are exciting/entertaining. Question for you? People watch Floyd because ___.? :think a) He happens to be fighting their favorite fighter. b) People want to see him get KTFO. c) Ambien and Restoril doesn't work, Floyd's fight does. d) all of the above e) none of the above- state your reason.
You clown what does that have to do with his ability to box and why he will beat FMJ? FMJ is in no way shape or form afraid of Manny. Manny's skill set doesn't inspire fear. If you are trying to make the case that *******s DKSAB? I agree.
Can't you just see the post-fight? "FMJ what happened in there? Why did you lose?" "His excitement was just... He was just too exciting." WTF?
:nono Firstly - I'm not a ******* (you *****s get so used to calling everyone that mentions just an ounce of something that is NOT PRO Mayweather, it's actually wearing a bit thin.) :verysad Secondly - You should realise that everytime you avidly defend your idol, you merely act as a counterpart to a real *******, i.e. you act just as irrationally as *******s, just on Floyd's side of the fence. :good Thirdly - No need to be ashamed of sharing a bit of love with a fellow ***** (just try and do it in private) :smooch
Nothing you said was anti-Mayweather, just homoerotic. So you just have homoerotic fantasies? My apologies. I am not avidly defending him. I am discussing a topic that I have a certain position on. If a valid position is presented I say so. This is a boxing forum last time I checked? Where you discuss... BOXING! :shock: Most of you clowns don't present a rational point. Just like I was joking about being "exciting" as a reason for winning a fight. Do you think that is rational position? :huh Again, here you go imagining man-love. Present a boxing point for discussion. So far you have said nothing about boxing, but a lot about man-on-man action. Maybe we are on the boxing forum for different reasons. :think