Floyd will never ever fight Manny.

People always say things like this when it comes to Mayweather. Mosley's style is not one most would consider simple for Floyd. Pacquiao is athletic and strong, but not smarter and more skilled than Floyd. If Manny takes the tests, Floyd will fight him and Manny will lose.

 

lol DOH!!!!

come on man, dont Pac get +2 power points in the ring for being "exciting"?

 

You seem to be making more out of my initial comment than it deserves and given you have so much to say about the topic of...what was it again...homoerotic fantasies? I'd say you must be an expert on the subject - no surprise there really. Either that or you just have an over-defensive attitude...for some reason. :think

The problem with *****s is they will take points from the opposite argument and misrepresent them by twisting or overstating, generally taking them out of context just to give the impression that they have a handle on their "position", which actually has more to do with insulting the opposite party rather than having anything to do with boxing. It's just '**** behaviour on the side of Mayweather.

To answer your question, [Pacquiao] being "exciting" as a reason for winning a fight is not a rational position to hold. However, you have taken one word from the point that was being put forward and, from this, think you have made great gains in supporting your own position. - It's a little pathetic really, to say the least.

You say you like to discuss Boxing here. Well let's see...


“FMJ will beat the brakes off of Pac. Pac knows it. That is why he won't sign this fight” :-(


...A top piece of sensible and well-reasoned Boxing analysis there…


…and another…

“Clottey rocked Pac and punched him at will.”:nono


…Yeah - it really showed…


...And then…

“So can you explain why Pac was scared to fight Mosley?”


Errr - Pac being "scared" to fight Mosley? This is a totally unsupported opinion, held by you, and you're asking someone else to explain it for you? :huh


Is this your idea of discussing Boxing? :?
Just appears to be a ***** rant. Very sad :verysad

 

When I hear it in a post fight as an excuse for a loss I will eat a cricket!

 

:rofl

 

Bro, he's a floyd fan through and through.

He hates pacquiao.

 

Moron YOU brought up and continue to bring up crap about men. Your dumb butt doesn't understand the word. Just ask.

Look Newb, half of these guys on here we have history with. I enjoy ragging on them. I still have logical debates with many guys here. Even guys in other camps and will readily admit if a guy has made a point.

I was JOKING about him being "exciting" and what it says about *******s you idiot. Maybe that is why we were laughing? Then you chimed in with your homoerotic fantasies.

I do like to discuss boxing. I also like a good e-scrap. Everything I said was true. If it wasn't?

-- Why are all the odds in FMJ's favor?
-- How did Pac's face get so busted up when Clottey barely even punched?
-- How do you explain Clottey's high punch percentage?
-- How do you explain the video with Roach saying Mosley can't get a fight with Pac because he is too good?

Yes Pac being scared to fight Mosley is an "opinion" shared by Roach, history, and me. You are further proving yourself to be a moron.

Yeah the guys on here that I respect earned it. By either defending their positions well or just being scrappy. You just are a cornball.

 

I didn't start this way. I was a Zab fan and ambivalent toward Mayweather.

This whole drug testing thing and the defense of this/these insane position(s), he changes them every five minutes, by fans of Manny just made me hate Pac.

 

Oh the irony...

Ah! So me being relatively new to this site and you having "history" makes you the authority. Ok - I will look forward to seeing you debate logically another time then.

Yeah - I got the joke shame you keep going on about the Man-Crush thing though - That was a joke too, btw.

The calculated odds do not determine certainty. Agreed?
Pacquiao definitely took some stiff shots but IMO it would be an overstatement to say he was rocked by Clottey and that Clottey could hit Pacquao at will.
Please provide a source for the video. I have seen two interviews with Roach, where he discusses Mosley and the offer of a catchweight contest but I am yet to see a video that has Roach state that Mosley is too good for Pacquiao and that Pacquiao is "scared" of Mosley. Oppositely, I do recall Pacquiao offering Mosley a bout, in his Clottey post-fight interview, if Mosley were to have beaten Mayweather.

Does calling me a moron, idiot and cornball make you feel superior in some way and deserving of respect? Either way, if it works for you...

I personally don't feel the need to return such insults but it certainly doesn't gain you respect.

If you want to prove a point to me then address my responses in italics, above. Thanks.

 

lol, exactly what you saying i should do then?

 

It isn't irony. It woudl be irony if I vividly described you in a homosexual act. Which I won't. It is the truth. You started and continued talking about that ignorance. I just referenced YOUR comments.

No idiot. It tells you why I said what I said and why you don't have the context to understand why I said it. Yes, I am the authority on the rational behind why I make certain comments. I tried to enlighten you, but you missed the point... again.

I have not gone on about it. I mention you, and other *******s, constantly bringing it up. Why doesn't your Newb butt search some threads and see.

Agreed? That is a given. Nothing is certain, but bookies don't take losing money lightly. How often are they wrong about fights of this magnitude? (Note: They are sometimes wrong. Goes back to that certainty thing.)

Watch the fight again and watch when Clottey throws the upper cuts. Clottey had rounds where he threw at a connect rate of up to 48%. His worst connect percentage was 17% which was better or equal to 5 rounds of Pac's. Yes, he hit him at will.

I am paraphrasing fool. So if a guy (Mosley), beat the guy (Margarito), that DESTROYED the guy (Cotto) you are about to face why are you facing him (Cotto)? The only sane reason is that you are scared. The money fight would be with the better fighter.

Why would Pac care about fighting winners? He fights the loser constantly. I bet you will say this reality is me being a "*****" too huh?

-- ODLH - Mayweather left over
-- Hatton - Mayweatehr left over
-- Cotto - Margarito left over
-- Clottey - Cotto left over (I think Clottey won, but I also think JC dived.)

I just enjoy bagging on you. Especially when you come with these "intelligent" responses. I don't respect you due to how silly the things you say are. I can't stand when people have "selective fact recall" when they discuss a topic. Calling people "*****s" doesn't constitute making valid counterpoints.

 

Pacquiao puts on a nice show but it is always against overmatched and often weight drained oppoents. He barely beat the best boxer he faced some people think Marquez beat him this is after he managed a draw in their first fight, after knocking him down three times in the first round.
Mayweather was only a light welter for a year and at the end of Tszyu's career. Williams was not able to hold onto his welterweight championship. He has been fighting at 154/160 lately. Margrito was overrated before plastergate.
If either Pacquiao or Mayweather has avoided tough fights it is Pacquiao.

 

Just give me a reason to respect the man. That is all I am asking. Tell why he...

-- Is physically harmed by the same testing protocol used by the entire Olympics
-- Is P4P#1, FOTD, and FOTY when he beat guys who were RECENTLY beaten (some to pulps)

 

If Floyd will never ever fight Manny, I think he will retire, run for US congress or be the commissioner of NSAC.

 

Probably commissioner of NSAC. He is learning all about how to deal with PED cheats. :good